My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25L - VOLUME LICENSING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
01/07/2008
>
25L - VOLUME LICENSING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:34:53 PM
Creation date
1/1/2008 11:38:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25L
Date
1/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.3 IMPORTANT! Proposals must be submitted and time-stamped received by the <br />Information Services Division on or before the d ead I I ne of: <br />November 14, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. <br />~If walked in) (If mailed) <br />City of Santa Ana City of Santa Ana <br />Information Services Division Information Services Division M-12 <br />20 Civic Center Plaza 20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Rootn 822 Cn the basement of Clty Hall] P.O. Box 1988 <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 <br />2.4 IMPORTANT! Facsimile transmission (FAX) or electronic mail (EMAIL) copies are not <br />acceptable. <br />2.5 Requests for information or questions regarding this RFP or the process may be directed <br />to: <br />Thomas J. Gergen <br />Manager, Information Services <br />Information Services Division <br />714.647.6958 voice <br />tgergen@santa-ana.org <br />2.6 Questions regarding this Request for Protiosal should be directed only to the person <br />designated above. <br />3. EVALUATION & SELECTION <br />3.1 EVALUATION <br />Selection shall be based upon a competitive evaluation process and not limited to price alone. <br />Proposers must satisfy the City in their ability to perform the services required. In the judgment <br />of the City, any proposal that does not provide adequate evidence that the Proposer has the <br />capabilities to perform the services sought by the City (see Sections 1) will not be further <br />considered. <br />It is not the City's intention to exclude very high bids or to automatically award an agreement to <br />the Proposer of the lowest price for services. The City seeks to get the best balance of service <br />value and price. <br />Based on the information provided in their RFP response, each of the Proposers will be <br />evaluated by a City selection team and will be assigned a point score for each of four evaluation <br />criteria. While evaluation is subjective by its nature, the City selection team will judge each <br />proposal on its merit in only the evaluation criteria areas. The weighted evaluation criteria <br />include: <br />Page 4 of 17 <br />25L-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.