My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 2100 W ALTON
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
01/07/2008
>
31A - 2100 W ALTON
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:34:56 PM
Creation date
1/1/2008 11:38:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
1/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• As part of the planning program for Armstrong Ranch Development <br />Project, a number of roadway improvements have been required to <br />improve the circulation system around Armstrong Ranch and the <br />proposed project. To facilitate access to the proposed project <br />traffic signals would be provided Raitt Street at Alton Avenue <br />and Bear Street at Alton Avenue. Additionally, Alton Avenue <br />would be widened from two lanes to four lanes. <br />The proposed project was analyzed as cumulative project in the <br />traffic analysis prepared for Armstrong Ranch. Based on trip <br />generation rates. in the traffic analysis, the proposed project <br />would generate 732 vehicle trips per day with 42 trips per day <br />occurring in Am Peak Hour and 56 trips per day occurring in the <br />PM Peak Hour. The traffic report for Armstrong Ranch determined <br />that the full- built of the Armstrong Ranch Development including <br />the proposed project in conjunction with the implementation of <br />roadway improvements identified in the traffic report, would not <br />cause any roadway segments or intersections within the project <br />area to operate at acceptable levels of service. To help fund <br />regional and area-wide transportation improvements, the proposed <br />project would be subject Transportation System Improvement fees <br />and San Joaquin Hills Corridor Fees. <br />• C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including <br />either an increase in traffic levels or a .change in <br />location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />Less Than Significant <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not increase the <br />level of the level of air traffic within the project area or <br />create a conflict for air navigation. <br />D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br />The circulation system developed for Armstrong Ranch considered <br />access to the proposed project. As mention previously a number <br />of circulation improvements would occur within the project area. <br />to ensure safe and efficient access to the proposed project. <br />E. Result in inadequate emergency access <br />• No Impact <br />2 v ~a~~BbT~ ~/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.