My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25H - ENGINEERING SVCS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
03/03/2008
>
25H - ENGINEERING SVCS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:33:07 PM
Creation date
2/27/2008 1:33:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25H
Date
3/3/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CEQA Compliance -The RFP suggests that a Supplemental EIR to the originally certified EIR (2002) may <br />be required for the project described herein. Based on conversations with City staff, it is URS' understanding <br />that the description of the project alternatives included in the originally certified EIR have not changed for <br />the proposed widening of Grand Avenue between First and Fourth Streets. It too is understood that there are <br />no other reasonable or feasible alternatives beyond what were analyzed in the previous EIR. Section 15162(a) <br />of the CEQA Guidelines states that when an EIR has been certified for a project, no Supplemental or <br />Subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the Lead Agency determines, on the basis of <br />substantial evidence in light of the whole public record, one of the following: <br />- Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous <br />EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the <br />severity of previously identified significant effects; <br />- Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken <br />which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant <br />impacts• <br />-New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known <br />with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the previous EIR was certified as complete, <br />shows any of the following: <br />• The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; or <br />• Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the <br />previous EIR; or <br />• Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, <br />and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project <br />proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or <br />• Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the <br />previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but <br />the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. <br />Based on our understanding of the project at this time, the widening of Grand Avenue between First and <br />Fourth Streets, as originally analyzed in the previously certified EIR, would not meet any of the above listed <br />criteria pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 or 15163 requiring preparation of a Subsequent or <br />Supplemental EIR, respectively. The updated analyses prepared for the NEPA document, as applicable, <br />would be incorporated by reference into the CEQA Addendum. As described in Section 15164(e) of the <br />CEQA Guidelines, a brief explanation (e.g., memorandum report) of the decision not to prepare a <br />Subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be included in the EIR Addendum <br />- the Addendum does need not be circulated for public review. If the City ultimately elects to prepare a . <br />Supplemental EIR based on the updated analyses (e.g., traffic, air quality, etc.), that document would be <br />approved within the same timeline as the NEPA EA thereby not negatively affecting the project schedule. <br />NEPA Compliance - As stated in the RFP, it is assumed that the project will require prepazation of a <br />NEPA EA, leading to issuance of a FONSI, and supporting technical studies pursuant to pertinent Caltrans <br />and FHWA guidelines. Because the project is located off the SHS, preparation of the NEPA EA will be <br />coordinated with Caltrans' District 12 Local Assistance Office, as further described in Chapter 6 of Caltrans' <br />LAPM, to meet current reporting requirements pursuant to Caltrans' SER and applicable Environmental <br />Handbooks. Provided below is a flow chart that illustrates the key milestones for preparation and approval of <br />a NEP A-compliant EA for a project off the SHS. A description of each milestone that will be conducted is <br />described in the below tasks following the flow chart. <br />Dele <br />Colleclionl <br />Site Vllh <br />PrepSle <br />Pnllminary <br />EnNronmentll <br />Stutlies (PES) <br />Fonn <br />Coordinttian <br />Meeting wtth <br />City end <br />Dllldni <br />District 12 <br />• Air duality Report <br />Tragic Impaq Report <br />• Hazardous Waste/I SA <br />25H-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.