My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2 - 2008
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
I
>
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2 - 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 10:18:01 AM
Creation date
3/5/2008 9:54:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY Lawson Software Americas, Inc.)
Contract #
A-2008-037
Agency
FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Council Approval Date
3/3/2008
Insurance Exp Date
11/1/2009
Destruction Year
0
Notes
NAME CHANGE AS OF 7/1/12 SEE LETTER AUTO & WORKER'S COMP EXP 11/1/09
Document Relationships
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2A
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\I
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2B
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\I
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2C
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\I
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2D -2010
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\I
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2E -2008
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\I
INFOR (US) INC. (FORMERLY LAWSON SOFTWARE) 2F
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\I
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Knowledge transfer is also provided through side -by -side system configuration. In this [Wanner, the City and S&S <br />-gvill be working side by side to build the resulting ysi-,m, as defined in the BPR. By becoming an expert in the <br />behind ti-,c scene,, workings of the system, ire City h- :conies a well rounded user with the ability to troubleshoot <br />complex issues. Additional]-,°. by being an expert in not only the use of the system. but also its configuration. the <br />City achieves greater self sufficiency and is able to adopt ownership of the system earlier in the project. <br />Stemming from the configuration ofthe system, knowledge transfer will continue to evolve through the testiiw� <br />activities. Users will perform normal operations using the newly configured enQuesta system to continue to refine <br />their skills. <br />The Simulation ev cut is an opportunity whereby the customer utilizes the cr >ntigured enQuesta system to test their <br />business processes. Situlation specifically cngages the customer in an independent, end -to -end test of all oftheir <br />key business processes to ensure Go -live readiness. <br />Lastly, by actively engaging in the user support at Go Live will serve as an additional opportunity to etrgage in <br />knoio ledge transfer. 1Vith S& ,S on site during Go Live, information will be shared during the course of normal <br />business operations. Additionally, the City's project team will continue the process of' knowledge transfer by <br />sharim-, knowledge with their peer groups to continually build knowledge. <br />15) What techniques will you use to ensure your consultants are transferring knowledge to City personnel? <br />Lawson Response: Please see response to (16 ) below. <br />16) What steps will you take to help the City verify that knowledge transfer has taken place? <br />Lawson Response: <br />Knowledge Transfer Activities <br />Transfer of knowledge from the consultant to the City staff begins with the demonstration of the product. The client <br />sees the solution and begins to understand the functionality and flexibility of the sotiware. <br />The next step is formal classroom Training. Once the vision is formulated and the basics are understood, the <br />consultants work with the client in application exploration, helping to put the pieces together. At this point it may <br />not be clear why a flag is set or what affect a field has on the ultimate solution. ]'reparation for the conference <br />room pilot takes the client through scripting of their business processes. Step by step instructions are created by the <br />client, with the help of the consultants, for each business process, as it will be performed in Lawson. The client <br />begins to see the results of the set -up decisions. <br />In the execution of the Conference Room Pilot, the client tests the process and evaluates the results with the <br />consultant. Client and consultant work together to determine if the results were satisfactory and explore other <br />options. At this point, the client begins to take ownership of the system and assumes some responsibility for issue <br />resolution. <br />The ability to effectively resolve Conference Room Pilot issues demonstrates the level of knowledge acquired <br />through the first three phases of the project. The project team evaluates the success of the first three phases and <br />determines preparedness to move forward to Acceptance Test (System Test). <br />The Acceptance Test (System Test) Phase allows the client to test more independently of the consultants, <br />Consultants are present to assist as issues arise, but no longer need to walk the client through each step of the <br />process. As with Conference Room Pilot, a period of issue resolution follows and the client team gains confidence, <br />as they are able to resolve their ovoi issues. <br />The Project team meets and determines their readiness to move forward. The final test of knoivied«e transfer is for <br />the client to deliver the end user training. In training the end users within their own team, the client assutnes full <br />ownership of the system. They have become the teacher. <br />Active client engagement and project commitment is essential to ensuring knowledge transfer. <br />Lawson Software - Confidential 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.