My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25N - STUDY CSUF
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
04/07/2008
>
25N - STUDY CSUF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:32:47 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 9:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25N
Date
4/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />clearly describe activities to be conducted during the study. Provide a description of <br />the call center and how it operates. <br /> <br />. Clearly identify any assistance and or documentation that would be needed from WIB <br />or One-Stop staff. <br /> <br />COST REASONABLENESS <br /> <br />Must include: <br /> <br />. A schedule indicating all costs to be charged to this project. Costs are to be broken <br />down based upon the various components of the project or it can be based on cost per <br />hour however all expenses must. be included in the proposal. <br /> <br />. The proposal will be considered a "firm offer" of services with prices guaranteed for <br />no less than 120 days. <br /> <br />EV ALUATION CRITERIA <br /> <br />The Oversight and Data Committee (a sub-committee of the Santa Ana Workforce <br />Investment Board) or other WIB members will review all proposals received by the <br />deadline and which are determined to have met the minimal requirements as set forth in <br />this Request for Proposal (RFP), Incomplete proposals, e-mail submittals with a detected <br />virus and proposals submitted after the deadline will be judged to be non-responsive and <br />will not be considered. <br /> <br />Background Information (past/Comparable Performance) - 40 points <br /> <br />Past experience, knowledge and effectiveness of the proposer/organization in <br />providing the same or similar services as outlined in the Request for Proposal <br />(RFP) will be evaluated to determine demonstrated performance and <br />qualifications. <br /> <br />Proposal Design and Quality - 40 points <br /> <br />Overall design and scope of ROI study planned, ability to meet the required <br />timelines, required steps needed to meet goals outlined in the Statement of Work, <br />understanding of the objectives, and clearly defined outcomes and final product <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Cost Reasonableness - 20 points <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />25N-23. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.