My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25N - STUDY CSUF
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
04/07/2008
>
25N - STUDY CSUF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:32:47 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 9:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25N
Date
4/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Proposal will be rated on cost effectiveness, costs which are judged reasonable, <br />necessary, allowable, and allocable under \VIA, and competitiveness of costs with <br />comparable proposals for similar services, <br /> <br />GENERAL INFORMATION <br /> <br />The WIB reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received and to cancel <br />in part or in its entirety this Request for Proposal (RFP), if it is in the best interest of the <br />WIB to do so. This RFP does not commit the WIB or the Santa Ana City Council to <br />award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal. A <br />proposer's acceptance of a copy of this RFP shall constitute knowledge and acceptance of <br />all conditions contained herein, All proposals become the property of the WIB. The <br />WIB incurs no ob.ligation to return or duplicate copies of the proposal for the .proposer. <br /> <br />Failed Competition - If, after following all the procurement procedures, only one proposal <br />is submitted - this is considered a failed competition. If two or more Request for Proposal <br />(RFP)'s were issued and only one proposal was returned and the WID determines that the <br />proposal is acceptable for funding, this is called a noncompetitive proposal (sole source). <br />The justification for funding a proposal that resulted from a "failed cornpetitionll under the <br />aforementioned circumstances would be "after solicitation of a number of sources, <br />competition was determined inadequate,lI <br /> <br />Appeal Process - If a proposer believes that any decision or denial of proposal was in <br />violation of any applicable statute or regulation, the proposer may make a good faith <br />complaint by submitting a letter delineating the complaint and referencing the actual <br />violation v.rithin lO working days of the date of notification of the funding decision. The <br />letter should be addressed to the Equal Opportunity Liaison (Lydia Morgan), Santa Ana <br />WORK Center, 1000 E. Santa Ana Blvd, #200, Santa Ana, CA 92701. <br /> <br />Contract Requirements - The organization/consultant selected for funding must enter into <br />a contract with the City of Santa Ana and be willing to comply with WIA rules and <br />regulations, as applicable and sign certifications regarding Drug-Free V/orkplace, <br />Debarment and Lobbying, as well as provide liability insurance with the City of Santa Ana <br />named as additional insurer for $1,000,000 (may be waived by city attorney). A boilerplate <br />contact is included as part of the RFP package for your reference along with additional <br />insured endorsement. See Exhibits "A" and "B". <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br /> <br />A boilerplate contract is attached for your infonnation along with the additional insuredtdocument the city requires when insurance is required of the proposer. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />25N-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.