My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH 1501 W MACARTHUR BLVD
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
05/05/2008
>
75B - PH 1501 W MACARTHUR BLVD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:32:17 PM
Creation date
4/30/2008 1:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
5/5/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, <br />use or disposal of hazardous materials? <br />B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance <br />or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? <br />C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous material sites compiles <br />pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a <br />significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed retail development would have no impact on transport or disposal of hazardous <br />material in that the proposed project would not involve activities that would emit hazardous or acutely <br />hazardous material. Additionally, according to the City of Santa Ana Fire Department and the City's <br />General Plan, the project site is not included on a list of hazardous material sites. Implementation of the <br />proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. <br />D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been <br />adopted, within two miles where a public airport or public use airport, would the project <br />result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? <br />No Impact <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR and the Orange County Airports Environs <br />Land Use Plan, Santa Ana is not located within any aircraft accident potential zones, nor is the proposed <br />project located within a John Wayne Airport Planning Area. Additionally, there are no private airstrips in <br />the City. Therefore, approval of the proposed project would not increase the potential for safety hazards <br />for people residing in or working within the City. <br />VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality <br />A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge <br />requirements? <br />E. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />Resulting an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? <br />J. Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction. <br />K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion downstream? <br />L. Result in increased impervious surfaces and associated runoff? <br />M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in <br />runoff flow rates or volumes. <br />N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Act Section <br />303(d) list. If so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of which the body is already <br />impaired? <br />7~3t~7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.