My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- "' ; ~ ; Environmental Checklist <br /> CE QA Compliance <br /> <br />F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, / <br />would the project result in a safety hazard for people <br />residing or working in the project area? <br />G. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ^ ^ ^ /^ <br />an adopted emergency response plan or emergency <br />evacuation plan. <br />H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ^ ^ ^ /^ <br />loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including <br />where wi{dlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or <br />where residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br />Issues $~ Supporting Information Sources Less Than <br /> Significant Less <br /> Potentially with Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact incorporated Impact Impact <br />VIII iHydrology and Water Quality -Would the project: <br />A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water ^ ^ ^/ ^ <br />quality standards or waste discharge requirements? <br />B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ^ ^ ^ ^/ <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge <br />such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer <br />volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table <br />level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby <br />wells would drop to a level which would not support <br />existing land uses or planned uses for which permits <br />have been granted)? <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ^ ^ ^/ ^ <br />the site or area, including through the alteration of <br />the course of stream or river, in a manner, which <br />would result in substantial erosion or sitation on or <br />off-site? <br />q. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ^ ^ ^/, ^ <br />the site or area, including through the alteration of <br />the course of stream or river, or substantially <br />increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a <br />manner, which would result in flooding on or off-site? <br />E. Create or contribute runoff water which would ^ ^ ~ ^ <br />exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial <br />additional sources of polluted run-ofY? <br />Page 24 of 64 <br />75E-28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.