My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- ~~ ;~ ; Environmental Checklist <br />CEQA Compliance <br />F. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? / <br />G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as ^ ^ ^ ^/ <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br />H. Place within a 100-year flaodplain structures which ^ ^ ^ ^/ <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br />I. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ^ ^ ^ ^/ <br />foss, injury or death involving flooding, including <br />flooding as a result of failure of a levee or dam? <br />J. inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ^ ^ ^ Q <br />Issues 8 Supporting Information Sources <br />IX. Land Use and Planning -Would the project: <br />A. PhysicaNy divide an established community? <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general plan, <br />specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />X. Mineral Resources -Would the project: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral <br />resource that would be of value to the region and the <br />residents of the state? <br />B. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important <br />mineral resource recavPry site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br />XI Noise -Would the project result in: <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant Less <br />Potentially with Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />impact Incorporated impact Impact <br />^ ^ ^ ^/ <br />^ ^ ^ ^/ <br />^ ^ ^ o <br />^ ^ ^ o <br />^ ^ ^ o <br />Page 25 of 64 <br />75E-29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.