Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Using the dust emissions factor developed by EPA for grading activities, the <br />PM,a fraction of fugitive dust emissions are predicted to be around 55 pounds per <br />day per acre disturbed in the absence of any dust control measures being <br />applied (SCAQMD Handbook, Table 9-2}, Mandatory measures required by <br />South Coast AQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) are generally assumed to reduce <br />this rate by approximately 50%. Average daily PM,o emissions during site <br />grading and other disturbance are stated 9n the SCAQMD Handbook to be 26.4 <br />pounds/acre. According to the California Air Resources Board (ARB}, PM2.~ is <br />normally considered to comprise up to 40% of PM~o in urban areas, such as the <br />proposed Project area. These estimates are based upon required dust control <br />measures in effect in 1993 when the AQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook was <br />prepared. Rule 403 was subsequently revised to require use of a greater array <br />of fugitive dust con#rol on construction projects. Use of enhanced dust control <br />procedures such as continual soil wetting, use of supplemental binders, early <br />paving, etc. can achieve substantially higher dust contra) efficiency. <br />PM-10 emissions were calculated by assuming that construction activities would <br />comprise approximately 0.1 acre for the proposed lift station, an additional 0.1 <br />acre for demolition of the existing lift station, and an additional 0.05 acre of <br />disturbance associated with the construction of new sewer pipelines. Thus, the <br />total area estimated for disturbance would be approximately 0.25 acre. <br />Assuming the entire impact area is under simultaneous heavy construction, <br />construction of the proposed project could result in emissions of up to 6.60 <br />pounds of PM~o and up to 2.64 pounds of PM2,5 per day. As shown in Table 2, <br />these values are far below the significance thresholds established by the <br />SCAQMD for these criteria pollutants, and construction emissions associated <br />with PM~o andlor PM2.5 would not be significant. <br />Equipment Exhaust <br />Construction equipment entails the use of internal diesel-powered combustion <br />engines which are not regulated in terms of allowable emission levels. <br />Equipment exhaust would be released during project construction activities from <br />mobile sources. Diesel-powered construction equipment would create gaseous <br />and particulate tailpipe emissions that are not regulated by smog control rules <br />such as for on-road sources. Emissions associated with diesel-powered <br />construction equipment (backhoes, cement trucks, portable compressors, etc.) <br />and associated with vehicles used by workers commuting to the job site would <br />occur. Assuming an average amount of energy expenditure of 4,000 brake- <br />horsepower hours per day, the daily pollutant emissions from equipment exhaust <br />would be as follows, which are below significance thresholds: <br />Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) -11.0 <br />Carbon Monoxide {CO) - 125.0 <br />Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) - 50.0 <br />Sulfur Dioxide (SOx) - 2.5 <br />These emission levels are small and the mobile nature of construction equipment <br />is such that no single receptor would be exposed to equipment emissions for any <br />Page 3& of 64 <br />75E-40 <br />