My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />lift station and appurtenances. Because odors associated with construction <br />would be brief and transitory, impacts are determined to be less than significant. <br />Odors from sewage systems are primarily due to inorganic or organic molecules. <br />The #wo most common inorganic molecules are hydrogen sulfide {H2S} and <br />ammonia (NH3). Hydrogen sulfide is the end product of decay processes of <br />materials containing sulfur that occur during oxygen-deficient (anaerobic} <br />decomposition. Ammonia evolves from reduction of high nitrogen content liquids <br />such as urea. H2S is created when sewage becomes stagnant, while NH3 <br />formation usually occurs when pH is high. <br />Fresh sewage within the wastewater system from its disposal in a toilet or sink <br />until it reaches the nearby pump station is still aerobic and has a neutral pH. H2S <br />or NH3 formation is low. Some H2S can be generated within the pump chamber <br />from organic scum or debris adhering to the wet well walls, but not in any <br />appreciable concentration. Odor strength is described in terms of the number of <br />dilutions with clean air that is required to reduce odor levels to where half the <br />amount of people can no longer detect the odor. The factor is called the number <br />of "odor units" (OU) or "dilutions-to-threshold" (D/T) in the sample. An odor of 1- <br />5 D/T is considered marginally detectable, 5-10 D/T is considered clearly <br />detectable, but not yet highly offensive. When levels exceed 10 D/T and the odor <br />is normally considered offensive, such as from sewage, a significant impact is <br />presumed to exist. <br />Odors may be released from the vents on a lift station and carried downwind. <br />During the daytime, winds across the project site are mainly from west to east <br />and during nighttime, winds are east to west. Thus, any odor-sensitive <br />development directly east or west of the lift station would be possibly affected by <br />odors. The distance extent of any odor "envelope" was estimated based upon <br />normal and worst-case odor conditions. To estimate the odor level (in units of <br />D/T} for a vent release of fresh versus stale sewage gas, an odor concentration <br />of 30 D/T was assumed for fresh sewage, and 2000 D/T for stagnan# material. <br />Under normal operational conditions ("fresh sewage"), the limits of marginal <br />detestability (1 D/T) is 25 feet. The clearly offensive odor limit (10 D/T) is around <br />6 feet from the vent. No odor sensitive uses are located within 25 feet of the <br />proposed lift station, thus, impacts under normal operating conditions would be <br />less than significant. During upset conditions with stagnant sewage in the <br />system, the zone 'of clearly offensive odor would be around 75 feet from the <br />source. Maintaining a distance buffer of at least 75 feet from the lift station to the <br />nearest odor-sensitive property is anticipated to maintain potential worst-case <br />odor conditions at less-than-significant levels. The nearest residential property is <br />located approximately 85 feet northeast of the site. <br />Additionally, effluent would be continuously moving through the wet well with a <br />minimum retention time. As such, it is unlikely that any significan# odors <br />detectable above ground will be generated. However, due to the complexities in <br />evaluating the sensitivity of nearby receptors to pa#ential odor impacts associated <br />with the proposed facility, and given the relative close proximity (i.e., 85 feet} of <br />Page 40 of 64 <br />75E-44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.