My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Analysis: There are no unique geologic features present within the areas proposed for <br />demolition and/or improvement by the project. Therefore, a significant impact <br />would not occur. <br />D, is fhe project located on strata ar soil that is unstable or that would become <br />unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, <br />lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Anaivsis: The project area comprises soils that are identified by the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS} as "Omni Silt Loam, Drained." According to <br />information available from the NRCS, such soils have limitations due to shrink- <br />. swell potential of the soil, but that these conditions can be overcome through <br />standard engineering practices. Compliance with the site-specific geotechnical <br />report recommendations, as is required pursuant to a note on the Building <br />Specifications, would ensure that significant impacts due to unstable sails are <br />precluded. <br />E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater, is the soil capable <br />of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: The project consists of the demolition <br />construction of a new sewer lift sta#ion, <br />appurtenances. As such, the proposed <br />alternative wastewater disposal systems. <br />of an existing sewer lift station, the <br />and construction of sewer mains and <br />project would not utilize septic tanks or <br />Vll. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Sources: Building Specifications; OCGP Safety Element. <br />Would the project: <br />A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine <br />transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? <br />Findina: Less than Significant Impact. <br />Anal sis: During construction and demolition activities, use and transport of hazardous <br />materials to the construction site would be minimal. Any transport of hazardous <br />materials to be used during the construction process would be conducted in <br />accordance with existing federal, state, and local regulations. <br />For long-term operation of the project, the only potentially hazardous material <br />transported through the site would be raw sewage, which would be pumped by <br />the lift station to a point where it could be gravity fed to the wastewater treatment <br />Page 46 of fi4 <br />75E-50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.