My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />XIV. Recreation <br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks <br />or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the <br />facility would occur or be accelerated? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: The proposed project would not result in the generation of additional residents <br />within the City of Santa Ana. Accordingly, there would be no increase in demand <br />for parkland which would result in the substan#ial or increased deterioration of <br />existing facilities. No impact would occur. <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require fhe construction or <br />expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect <br />on the environment? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: The proposed project would not result in the generation of additional residents <br />within the City of Santa Ana. Accordingly, there would be no new demand for <br />parkland facilities associated with the proposed project. No impact would occur. <br />XV. Transportation/Traffic <br />Would the project: <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic <br />load and capacity of fhe street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in <br />either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or <br />congestion at intersections)? <br />Finding: Less than Significant with Mifiigation Incorporated. <br />Analysis: Long-term operation of the proposed lift station and appurtenances would have <br />no impact on traffic on surrounding roadways and intersections. In the long-term, <br />significant impacts would not occur. <br />During construction of the proposed project, however, construction activities <br />would occur partially within the rights-of-way far Segerstrom Avenue, Bristol <br />Street, and San Lorenzo Avenue. Impacts during construction along San <br />Lorenzo Avenue are not anticipated to be significant because the proposed <br />improvements would occur at the western terminus of the roadway. <br />Improvements within Segerstrom Avenue and Bristol Street would, however, <br />result in temporary disruptions in traffic patterns. Along both roadways, at least <br />one travel lane, and possibly up to two travel lanes, would be closed to facilitate <br />proposed construction activities. During the time when lane closures occur, the <br />capacity for both roadways would effectively be reduced. As a result, total traffic <br />along both roadways would likely exceed their respective capacities, particularly <br />Page 57 of 64 <br />75E-61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.