Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />during the AM and PM peak hours. This is evaluated as a significant near-term <br />impact for which mitigation would be required. <br />Also during construction, construction personnel would commute to the <br />construction area. In addition, construction activities proposed by the project <br />would result in truck traffic to-and-from the project site during a typical workday. <br />The number of construction workers anticipated would be determined based on <br />the contractor's scheduling and order of work. Impacts associated with <br />construction workers and construction vehicles would be temporary in nature and <br />would not exceed the available capacity of the local roadway network; significant <br />impacts would not occur. <br />Mitigation Measures: <br />MM-2 Prior to the commencement of proposed construction or demolition activities <br />requiring lane closures or other traffic disruptions along Segerstrom Avenue and/or <br />Bristol Street, the construction contract documents shall address measures to be <br />undertaken during construction activities to minimize disruptions to the normal flaw <br />of traffic. Examples of measures to be undertaken include, but shah not necessarily <br />be limited to= a) the identification of detour routes; b) signage plan identifying <br />proposed detour routes; c) signage for advanced notification of anticipated lane <br />closures/disruptions; d) any necessary traffic control personnel; and e) any other <br />measures deemed necessary to minimize disruptions to traffic during canstruction of <br />the proposed project. <br />Significance After Mitigation: <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measure MM-2 would ensure that disruptions to the normal <br />flow of traffic during construction of the proposed facility are minimized. With <br />implementation of the required mitigation, impacts to circulation and traffic during <br />construction would be reduced to a level below significant. <br />6. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established <br />by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or <br />highways? <br />Findin No Impact. <br />Analysis: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the generation of any <br />new traffic in the project area. Accordingly, the project would not exceed the <br />level of service standard established by the county congestion management <br />agency for designated roads or highways. <br />C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic <br />levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Page 58 of 64 <br />75E-62 <br />