My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Analysis: Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact on air patterns. <br />No impact would occur. <br />D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />Fin_ ....dins; No impact. <br />Analysis: With the exception of resurfacing portions of several existing roadways, the <br />project does not propose the construction or alteration of any existing roadways. <br />As such, the project would not increase any hazards due to a design feature or <br />incompatible use. No impact would occur. <br />E. Result in inadequate emergency access? <br />Findin No Impact. <br />Analvsis: The proposed project would have no impact on existing emergency access <br />routes. <br />F. Result in inadequate parking capacity? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: The proposed project would have no impact on existing parking capacity, and <br />would not result in the demand for new parking capacity. No impact would occur. <br />G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus <br />turnouts, bicycle racks}? <br />Findin No Impact. <br />Anai}~sis: The proposed project would have no impact on adopted policies supporting <br />alternative transportation. No impact would occur. <br />XVI. Utilities and Service Systems <br />Would the project: <br />A. Exceed wastewater treatment requiremenfs of the applfcable Regional Water <br />Quality Control Board? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analvsis: The proposed project consists merely of the demolition of an existing sewer lift <br />station and the construction of a replacement facility and associated <br />appurtenances. As such, the project has no potential to exceed the wastewater <br />Page 59 of 64 <br />75E-63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.