Laserfiche WebLink
EIR No. 2007-02; ZOA No. 2008-04; <br />DA No. 2004-04; CUP No. 2008-34; <br />VTTM No. 2008-04; and SPR No. 2008-05 <br />January 12, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />The City has evaluated the comments on environmental issues received from <br />persons or agencies. In accordance with CEQA, each of the public agencies <br />and interested parties that comment on the draft EIR will be provided a <br />response to their comments. Within the DEIR is the Mitigation Monitoring <br />Program for the project. In addition, the Findings of Fact and Statement <br />of Overriding Considerations have been included (Exhibit 4). <br />The DEIR has determined that implementation of the project would result in <br />unavoidable adverse impacts to aesthetics, air quality and traffic. All <br />other potential impacts associated with the project were determined to be <br />less than significant or were provided with mitigation to reduce impacts <br />to a level considered less than significant. <br />Aesthetic impacts are a result of shade patterns cast by the height of the <br />proposed tower and parking structure. Shade would be cast on Town and <br />Country Manor Retirement Center east of the project and on residential <br />uses west, northeast, south and southeast of the project site as well as <br />park uses which are not shaded by existing site features. These areas <br />would receive one-half hour more of shade at various times of the year. <br />Air quality impacts are a result of construction and during the operation <br />of the completed .project. During construction .and the application of <br />architectural coatings, thresholds established by the Southern California <br />Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) will be exceeded and result in a <br />significant adverse short-term regional air quality impact. Additionally, <br />after project completion and operation begins, emissions of reactive <br />organic gases (ROG) produced by vehicle and stationary sources will result <br />in exceedance of operational thresholds established by SCAQMD. These ROG <br />emissions are based on the volume of project related trips attributable to <br />the proposed project. As a result, the ROG emissions cannot be mitigated <br />to below a level of significance and would constitute an unavoidable <br />significant adverse impact related to air quality. <br />Implementation of the proposed tower would result in temporary <br />cumulative traffic impacts. The 2010 traffic conditions between La Veta <br />Avenue and Town and Country Road cannot be mitigated to below a level of <br />significance without amending the Master Plan of Arterial Highway (MPAH) <br />road classification from a Major Arterial to a Principal Arterial. This <br />road reclassification would provide one additional lane in each <br />direction. In the year 2030, this road segment will operate at an <br />75A-7 <br />