Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit II <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Source of Funds <br />- User Fee Activities - <br />2008/2009 <br /> <br /> COfts, U_ Fumkd by een'rW1i1d <br /> Function/ktlvify FM${!fViCl'f u,'" F~ef SdiJi!!Y' <br />PI<tnning Divi~i:-::n $2,671.971 $558.059 21% ....S2.1t~,!Ilf 19'1ii <br />Pu:tdhg Safety Division $6.424.182 \3.055.352 48% .jSt'l;~6l!!~ 52% <br />Oe\lel~pme'1l: E"'lgi:-.eering Divis:o, $639,776 $304,852 480/CI 0'_",' "S~;~ 52% <br />Grand Total: $9.735.929 $3.91B.263 4O"k $~i'!l11#>6 60% <br /> <br />Exhibit I Indicates that user fees .-ecovc" 40% of full cost. leaVIng 60% or $5.8 mill on to be funded by other funding sources. This $5.8 million <br />represents a . wlneow of opportunity" for the City to Increase fees and gene,al fiJnd revenues, with a co""'espondlng c.ecrease In the subsldlza:lon of <br />servkelli by the g,efle'-.t fund. <br /> <br />The stud)"s prirr,ary objective is to p"ovido the City's decision.ma~ers with basi<: datil needed fer setting fees. This reJ=o,,-: details the fdl cos: of <br />ser'lices. ;md prf':'>t'nl.s proposed fees ~rd project?d reVf'l:ntJes brtsed on recommenried user fee cost ~ecovery :f':Vf~l~. R&ommanduiol'lS lNere bitsed <br />upon carefJI consideration of :he results of the cost analysis. h:stoncal COSt recovery levels. ant market comparisons. <br /> <br />;u <br />(ll <br />U> <br />o <br />s: <br />6' <br />'" <br />"Uz <br />&0 <br />(llN <br />~o <br />",0 <br />0'1' <br />~o <br />"'~ <br />OJ OJ <br /> <br />MGT <br /> <br />0- <br />0< <br />W <br />"' <br />2; <br /><0 <br /> <br />or "1II[lIel.. I~C. <br />