My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25D - 55 AND ALTON AVE OVERCROSSING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
04/06/2009
>
25D - 55 AND ALTON AVE OVERCROSSING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:21:53 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25D
Date
4/6/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Reference (SER) website, Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual, local and state CEQA <br />Guidelines, and FHWA Technical Advisory 6640.81 Guidance on Preparing and Processing Environmental and <br />Section 4(f) Documents. <br />The Huitt-Zollars Team will prepare a NEPAICEQA Re-Validation form based on the form that is available on the <br />Caltrans SER at the time that the analyses are performed. <br />The Huitt-Zollars Team will provide a brief discussion of the validity of the information in the EIRIEA related to the <br />following resources. <br />• Geology, Soils, Seismicity <br />• Hydrology, Water Quality, Stormwater Runoff <br />• Hazardous Waste/Materials <br />• Air Quality <br />• Noise <br />• Energy <br />• Biological Resources <br />• Floodplains <br />• Land Use, Planning, and Growth <br />• Community Impacts (Social, Economic) and Environmental Justice <br />• UtilitieslEmergency Services <br />• Parking <br />• Traffic Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities <br />• Visual/Aesthetics <br />• Cultural Resources <br />For most of these resources it is assumed that the brief discussion will be sufficient as conditions would not have <br />changed sufficiently to substantially change the setting and impacts related to the proposed project. However, for <br />some resources it is assumed that additional analyses will be required. To document changes in environmental <br />impacts, if any, the following analyses will be conducted. It is assumed that all project components, features, and <br />construction related activities will be located within the footprint that was identified and evaluated in the EIR/EA, <br />that the following documentation will encompass all of the supporting environmental effort that is required for the <br />re-validation, that no new mitigation will be identified or required, that no revisions to the EIR/EA itself will be <br />required, and that no recirculation or public availability of the EIR/EA will be required. <br />Based on the results of the analyses listed below, a determination will be provided on the NEPAICEQA Re- <br />validation Form regarding the validity of the existing NEPA and CEQA documents and findings. It is assumed that <br />the finding will be that the NEPA and CEQA document are still valid in conjunction with the listed analyses and that <br />no further action is required related to environmental documentation. <br />Task 3.2.1 Biological Resources <br />A review of the currently listed federal and state species will be performed along with obtaining an updated species <br />list from the United States Fish and Wildlife Services. In addition, a field reconnaissance will be performed to <br />evaluate the potential for any newly listed or otherwise sensitive species to exist along the project alignment. A re- <br />validation of the jurisdictional delineation of federal and state waters will also be performed to confirm that the <br />results in the EIR/EA remain valid. It is assumed that only a field reconnaissance related to federal and state <br />waters will be performed, that the original findings will still be valid, and that no new delineation or documentation <br />will be required. However, since the project may actually reduce the amount of jurisdictional impacts, the obtaining <br />of permits (401 Water Quality Certification, 404 Permit, and Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement) is not <br />included in this scope and cost. Once the updated field reconnaissance is completed then the need for permits will <br />be discussed with the City and a scope and cost for this work can be submitted, if permits are required. The results <br />of this analysis will be documented in a technical memorandum to be included as an attachment to the <br />25D-52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.