My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25D - 55 AND ALTON AVE OVERCROSSING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
04/06/2009
>
25D - 55 AND ALTON AVE OVERCROSSING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:21:53 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25D
Date
4/6/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEPAICEQA Re-Validation. It is assumed that the results of the reconnaissance level analyses will be negative <br />and that no additional biological work (including any focused surveys) will be required. <br />Task 3.2.2 Cultural Resources <br />The Huitt-Zollars Team will conduct a records search at the Information Center of the California Historical <br />Resources Information System to determine if any new cultural sites have been identified since the Historic <br />Property Survey Report (HPSR) was prepared for the proposed project. In addition, a field reconnaissance of <br />the structures located along the project route will be conducted to confirm that no resources are present that <br />were not eligible at the time that the HPSR was prepared. It is assumed that the findings of the above <br />evaluations will be negative and that the results will be documented in a technical memorandum to be included <br />as an attachment to the NEPAICEQA Re-Validation. <br />Task 3.2.3 Noise <br />Afield reconnaissance of the project alignment will be conducted to confirm whether any new noise sensitive receptors <br />have been constructed since the noise analyses for the project were originally prepared. In addition, it will be <br />documented whether the previously identified receptors (i.e., Carriage Stop Motel, Adagio Apartment Complex, and <br />residence at 110 Alton Avenue) are still present. It is assumed that no new sensitive noise receptors will be identified. <br />Because the traffic study is assumed to require an update, it is assumed that the noise modeling will be updated to <br />address any changes in predicted noise levels at these three receptors. New short term noise measurements will be <br />conducted at these three receptors. In addition, one long-term noise measurement will be conducted if a secure <br />location can be identified. A focused noise model for these receptors will be developed based on the traffic noise <br />model that was used for the EIRIEA to be provided by the City. A noise technical memorandum will be prepared as an <br />attachment to the NEPAICEQA Re-Validation form that focuses on these three receptors. A full noise study report is <br />not assumed or included in this scope. It is assumed that at a minimum a wall will be found to be acoustically feasible <br />at 110 Alton Avenue, as in the current EIRIEA, and that a Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) will be required. <br />Huitt-Zollars will prepare a NADR based on the current NADR annotated outline that will address the reasonableness <br />of any walls that are found to be acoustically feasible. <br />Task 3.2.4 Air Quality <br />New requirements related to mobile source air toxics (MSATs), greenhouse gas emissions, and particulate <br />matter (PM10 and PM2.5) have been issued since the air quality analysis was prepared for the proposed project. <br />An air quality technical memorandum will be prepared as an attachment to the NEPA/CEQA Re-Validation form <br />that addresses the following items. The project area has been classified as an attainment /maintenance area <br />for carbon monoxide (CO). Since a detailed CO analysis was prepared and included in the existing EIR/EA and <br />since the project area is not in attainment I maintenance, it is assumed that no additional CO analyses will be <br />required. <br />• Regional Transportation Plan (RTPJ and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). Document <br />the current status of the project with regard to its inclusion in the 2008 RTP and RTIP and confirm that the <br />scope of the project matches the RTIP description. It is assumed that the project is included and described <br />accurately in the 2008 RTIP. <br />Localized PMzs/PM,o Hot Spot Analysis. Analyze the degree to which project-related traffic volumes have a <br />potential to affect local PMz.s and PM,o concentrations, based on the United States Environmental Protection <br />Agency (EPA) guidance document entitled Transportation Conformity Guidance for Qualitative Hot-spot <br />Analyses in PMzS and PM,o Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas. This scope and cost assumes that a <br />screening level analysis is appropriate, and that no modeling will be required by Caltrans or FHWA to address <br />PMz.S and PM,o. <br />• Mobile Source Air Toxics. Evaluate proposed project-related mobile source air toxics (MSATs) emissions in <br />accordance with FHWA interim guidance on how MSATs should be addressed in NEPA documents. It is <br />not assumed that extensive qualitative analyses would be required to address MSATs. If an extensive <br />quantitative analysis is required for the project, then a scope and cost estimate would be provided for this <br />additional effort. <br />25D-53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.