Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />and corrosion measures, erosion control, shoring and internal bracing and plan review are required. <br />Compliance with the 2007 California Building Code would reduce potential liquefaction impacts to a level <br />considered less than significant. <br />A-4. Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? <br />A-5 Landslides? <br />A-6 Flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? <br />A-7 Wildland fires, including where wildfires are adjacent to urbanized areas and where <br />residences are intermixed with wildland? <br />No Impact <br />The project site is flat without any topographical relief. According to the City's General Plan, there are no <br />landslide planes on the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in <br />adverse impacts in regards to landslides. Additionally, the proposed project would not expose people to a <br />significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by a tsunami, seiche or mudflow. Impacts by <br />tsunami are associated with proximity to the ocean. The project site is located approximately 11 miles <br />from the Pacific Ocean, which is a sufficient distance to protect the site from such impacts. The closest <br />enclosed bodies of water that could result in an earthquake induced seiche are the Prado Dam located 16 <br />miles northeast of the project site near the City of Corona, and the Santiago Dam located approximately <br />10 miles east of the project site in Silverado. The Santa Ana River Main Stem Project has implemented <br />flood control improvements to both the Prado Dam and Lower Santa Ana River which has reduced the <br />risk of inundation in the event of a seiche in Prado Dam. Therefore, there would be no impact to the <br />project site as a result of overflow caused by seiche. The project site located on a parcel with limited <br />topographical relief. The project site is not located downhill from any slope of sufficient size to cause <br />mudflows. Finally, there are no wildlands in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project site. <br />Consequently, development of the proposed project would not result in the exposure of people or <br />structures to hazards associated with wildland fires. Therefore, no impact would occur. <br />B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />Less than Significant Impact <br />Erosion refers to the removal of soil from exposed bedrock surfaces by water or wind. The effects of <br />erosion are intensified with an increase in slope, the narrowing of runoff channels and by the removal of <br />groundcover, which leaves the soil exposed. Construction operations for the proposed project would <br />require excavation of onsite soils. The uncovered soils on the project site could potentially result in <br />erosion and sedimentation impacts to onsite and offsite drainage facilities absent appropriate measures <br />to limit topsoil losses. All new developments in the City of Santa Ana, including the proposed project, are <br />required to prepare a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) post-construction storm <br />water management plan in accordance the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) <br />and the city of Santa Ana Local Implementation Plan (LIP) that must include all applicable post <br />construction BMPs for this project. In addition, to the implementation and maintenance of post- <br />construction Best Management Practices (BMPs), erosion would also be controlled by the landscaping <br />proposed for all remaining pervious areas of the project as proposed by the applicant. Compliance with <br />existing State, regional and local regulations, NPDES permit requirements and implementation of <br />SWPPP-specified project-specific BMPs, together with the installation landscape in the post construction <br />phase and on-going maintenance and monitoring of construction and subsequent post-construction BMPs <br />would ensure that the project impacts with respect to topsoil loss and erosion would be less-than- <br />significant. <br />C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geological feature? <br />7 5A-44 <br />