Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater <br />recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local <br />groundwater table level. <br />No Impact <br />The proposed project would not interfere with ground water recharge because the project area is not <br />located in an area that is known to recharge the ground water system. Additionally, construction <br />operations for the proposed project would not encroach onto the underground water basin. No impacts <br />would occur <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial <br />erosion or siltation on or off-site? <br />D. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of <br />surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off-site? <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br />The project site is generally flat and located in an urbanized area currently served by an existing storm <br />drain system. The proposed project will not alter the existing drainage pattern of the site and will connect <br />to the storm drain system as required by the City regulations. As previously noted, erosion or siltation <br />could occur during construction related earthmoving activities. The project would be required to comply <br />with the requirements of the NPDES General Construction permit and project approved SWPPP. During <br />the site grading and construction short-term runoff impacts would be addressed through the incorporation <br />of construction erosion and sediment control and flooding BMPs. Compliance with the permit <br />requirements, the project's construction-related impacts of erosion and/or flooding would less than <br />significant. <br />F. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard <br />Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br />G. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? <br />No Impact <br />The City of Santa Ana is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Communities <br />participating in the NFIP must adopt and enforce minimum floodplain management standards, including <br />identification of flood hazards and flood risks. Participation in the NFIP allows communities to purchase <br />low cost insurance protection against losses from flooding. The published Flood Insurance Rate Maps <br />(FIRM) for the project site is included on Community Panel No. 06002320256H. The project site is <br />located entirely in Zone X, which is defined as areas beyond the limits of the 100-year flood and 500-year <br />flood. The project site protected from the 1 percent annual chance flood by a levee constructed above <br />the natural bank of the Santa Ana River to the east of the project site. Since the implementation of the <br />proposed project would not place housing within a mapped flood hazard area, there would be no impact. <br />IX. Land Use and Planning <br />A. Physically divide an established community? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community plan? <br />75A-47 <br />