My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-025 - Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-02
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
2009-025 - Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:26:00 PM
Creation date
6/18/2009 12:28:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2009-025
Date
5/18/2009
Destruction Year
Perm
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resources Board (GARB) and ensures statewide consistency in how CO2 emissions are modeled and <br />reported from various project types. The URBEMIS model is the most effective tool for assessing COZ <br />greenhouse gas emissions available to date. <br />The EIR identified air quality impacts that would result from project implementation, both short-term <br />construction and long-term operational. As detailed in the EIR, project-related operational emissions <br />will exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for CO, ROG, and NOx primarily due to area source <br />(consumer product) emissions. These are considered an unavoidable adverse impact. Additionally, <br />construction activity impacts will exceed significance thresholds for ROG due to application of <br />architectural coatings. The removal of the Cinema Lofts and the retaiUrestaurant uses, and addition of <br />the hotel is not anticipated to either greatly alleviate or greatly increase project impacts from what was <br />analyzed in the EIR. Thus, the project's impacts on air quality are anticipated to remain the same as the <br />original project's impacts, which on a cumulative basis are significant and adverse. No changes have <br />occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and <br />complete for this topic. <br />b) Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or <br />projected air quality violation? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The Air Quality Assessment in the EIR included projected COZ emissions for demolition, mass <br />grading, fine grading, trenching, building construction, architectural coatings, and asphalt emissions. <br />Construction and operational emissions are difficult to assess, given that no thresholds for greenhouse <br />gases have been established. Typical thresholds are based on types of use, such as residential, office, or <br />retail, and are further defined by such things as number of units and square footage. The project will <br />include a construction phase during which heavy equipment will be used for demolition, grading, and <br />construction. <br />The construction schedule for the lofts, retail and restaurant portion of the previous project was 14 <br />months for complete build out, and the construction schedule for the proposed project is anticipated to <br />be the same. Short-term impacts in the area of greenhouse gases will be due to the use of heavy <br />equipment. Short-term construction related impacts were limited to ROG emissions from architectural <br />coatings. As detailed in the EIR, ROG emissions still exceed threshold levels even with the use of all <br />available measures if all project paints and coating were applied in a single month. Thus, air quality <br />impacts from construction of the proposed project will not change substantially from the previous <br />analysis. <br />As noted, in the EIR, the MacArthur Place South project will exceed thresholds for CO, ROG, and <br />NOx in the long-term operational use. Long-term project-related impacts include exceeding the South <br />Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) significance thresholds for CO, ROG, and NOx <br />primarily due to area source (consumer product) emissions. The addition of the 185-room hotel will <br />result in an increase in CO due to consumer product emissions by the hotel guests. The proposed <br />reduction in unit size (removal of 15 units because the Cinema Lofts will not be built) could result in <br />lower population estimates, which could reduce consumer use emissions. The EIR includes mitigation <br />measures to reduce and minimize air quality impacts. <br />The following Mitigation Measure is proposed in order to further minimize the incremental increase <br />from greenhouse gases during construction of the hotel: <br />Mitigation Measure A¢ 1 -During design and construction, the project developer shall <br />incorporate features into the project that will minimize impacts from greenhouse gas emissions <br />such as planting onsite trees as a means of providing carbon storage, promoting energy saving <br />measures beyond Title 24 requirements, and encouraging the use of Energy Star equipment and <br />appliances. <br />Resolution No. 2009-025 <br />Mali2lat;®`~outh <br />EIR Addendum <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.