2009-025 - Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-02

Home Browse Search

from the analysis provided in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete for this topic. h) Would the project place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) The EIR identified impacts related to flood hazards that would result from project implementation. The project is not located in a 100-year flood hazard area. No changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete for this topic. i) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) The EIR identified impacts related to flooding that would result from project implementation. The project is not located in the vicinity of a levee or a dam. No changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete for this topic. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) The EIR identified impacts related to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow that would result from project implementation. No changes have occurred in this area from the analysis provided in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete for this topic. VI. Land Use and Planning Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) The project site is comprised of an office park and as a result, no established community exists. Thus, the project will not physically divide an established community. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete for this topic. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) The City's General Plan land use designation for the project site is District Center (DC), which specifically allows mixed-use development. Hotels are a permitted use in the DC designation. As detailed in the EIR, the project site underwent a zone change from General Commercial (C2) to the Specific Development (SD) zone. The project, as proposed, will have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) No habitat conservation or natural community conservation plan is applicable to the proposed project. The project will have no new or more severe impacts beyond those addressed in the EIR. Therefore, the EIR remains adequate and complete with respect to this topic. Resolution No. 2009-025 Mac1a~3Rlab®~outh EIR Addendum 40