2009-034 (2) - Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Fairhaven/Lincoln

Home Browse Search

7. Impacts Found Not to Be Significant- Table 7-1 Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical !macts Found Not to Be Significant Environmental issues initial Study Determination . Al R QUALITY Where available, -the..'s-10. nifie nce.cr teri estaafi hed by-the�applieabl.e air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to rake the folio in determinations. WOW. the, pro oet: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, Would the project: c a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly of through habitat No Impact modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special No Impact status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the d California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No impact b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive cemeteries? natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations No Impact or by the California Department of Fish and Dame or U.S. Fish and wildlife landslide, lateralspreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, No Impact vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory No Impact wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurse sites'? e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological No Impact resources, such as a tree preservation olio or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or No impact state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. 'Would the vroiaot. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical No Impact p resource as defined in §16664.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of are afchaeological Less than significant Impact Less than Significant impact resource pursuant to § 15064,5? c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or No Impact Less than significant irnpaot unique geologic feature? Less than Significant Impact d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal No impact Less than Significant Impact cemeteries? II I - U EU LU U Y AN U 5 [A I L * Would the 'Drolect: a) Expose people or structures to potentarl substantial adverse effects, Less than i nificant Impact g p including the risk of loss, inju t ar death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Jquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the Mate Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a Less than Significant impact known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 4. ii) Stroag seismic ground shaking? Less than significant irnpaot iii) Seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant Impact iv Landslides? No Impact b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site Less than Significant Impact landslide, lateralspreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Page 7-2 . The Planning Center Resolution No. 2009 -034 Page 100 of 130 Alarcb 2009