Laserfiche WebLink
7. Impacts Found Not to Be Significant <br />Table 7 -1 <br />LTILacts Four Not to Sign r"fi a n <br />Environmental Issu <br />lrrifial Study Determination <br />c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of � Impact <br />replacement housin m elsewhere? p <br />II. P U BLI C - S ERVI C ES. Would t e-:pr ject result in uh tantial adverse phy 1, al impacts associated. with the provision <br />of new or phVs1 cal l 'a I I e re d. - gave r n rn e nta I facilities, need for ne r"e 'ph sicaIl . altered VaverrimentaI- fa011it!e , the construction <br />of which could cause significant onvi rorrmenta1Impacts}: in Older to: m ai'h t6i h ak Cie': ptAb 16 se rvic ratios, response times or other <br />performance objectives for ah' of -the public services. <br />a Eire protection? Less than Significant Impact <br />b Police protection? Less than Significant Impact <br />c Schools? N o Im act <br />Parks? <br />ZL - ULr101 PUU11 U IdUIRIM <br />XIV. RECREATION. <br />a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional <br />parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical <br />— deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? <br />b Does the protect include recreational facilities or require the construction or <br />expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical <br />effect on the environment? <br />-- - -- - - - -- -- - - - - - -- <br />X . TRANS PO RTATI TR FF1 C . Would the ara' 100L :.:...:. <br />No Impact <br />No Imaact <br />No Impact <br />No impact <br />bj <br />Exceed, either individually or cumulabvely, a level of service standard <br />No Impact <br />p <br />established by the counter congestion management agency for designated <br />No Impact <br />b) <br />roads or highways? <br />c) <br />Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in <br />No Impact <br />traff ic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.? <br />e <br />Result in inadequate emergent access? <br />less than Significant Impact <br />f <br />Result in inadequate parking, capacity? <br />No Impact <br />g) <br />Conflict with adapted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative <br />No Impact <br />d) <br />transportation e,g., bus turnouts, bit cle racks ? <br />No Impact <br />..Would the oroie: <br />a)... <br />Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional <br />No Impact <br />p <br />Water Quality Control Board? <br />b) <br />Require or result in the construction of new wafter or waste water treatment <br />facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could <br />No Impact <br />cause significant environmental effects"? <br />c) <br />Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities <br />or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />No Impact <br />significant environmental effects? <br />d) <br />Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing <br />No Impact <br />entitlements and resources or are new or expanded enttlements needed? <br />e) <br />Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which <br />serves or may serge the project that R has adequate capacity to serve the <br />No Impact <br />project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing <br />commitments? <br />f) <br />Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate <br />Less than Significant Impact <br />the project's solid waste disposal needs? <br />g) <br />Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid <br />No Impact <br />waste"? <br />93 <br />RairhavenlLl'ncoln and {Santa C'l ralL into n Intersection Modifications City of Santa Ana a Page 7-5 <br />Suppleme o the Santa Ana Second Hawn Track Project EIR Resolution No. 2009 -034 <br />Page 103 of 130 <br />