Laserfiche WebLink
7. ImPacts Found Not to Be Significant <br />Table -T <br />Impacts Found Not to Be ftnificant <br />Environmental Iss es <br />initial Study Determination <br />h) Place within a loo -year flood hazard area structures which would impede <br />or redirect flood flows? <br />No Impact <br />i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death <br />involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or <br />No Impact <br />dam? <br />j Inundaton by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />No Impact <br />Potent.iaqyJm pact stormwater runoff from construction activities? <br />No Impact <br />I Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction activities? <br />No Impact <br />m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of <br />material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment <br />maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials <br />No Impact <br />handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work <br />areas? <br />n) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial <br />No Impact <br />uses of the receiving waters? <br />o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of <br />No Impact <br />stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? <br />p) Create significant increases in erosion of the protect site or surrounding <br />No Impact <br />areas? <br />IX. LAID USE AND PLAT HI . duld the project; <br />a _EhIsically divide an established community? <br />Less than Sig nificant Impact <br />b Conflict with any applicable lard use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency <br />with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general <br />No Impact <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for <br />the purpose of avoiding or MLb ating an environmental effect? <br />c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br />No Impact <br />p <br />conservation Ian? <br />X. MINERAL RESOURCES. wo- uld'the'preje t. ::: :..... <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a <br />No Impact <br />value to the region and the residents of the state? <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a kcal general plan, specific plan or other land <br />No Impact <br />use plan? <br />, Would the proles# result in: <br />b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or <br />Less # <br />than Significant Impact <br />groundborne noise levels'? <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan <br />has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use <br />No Impact <br />airport, would the project expose people rending or working in the project <br />area to excessive noise levels? <br />f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose <br />No Impact <br />people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br />X1I. PO PULATI ON AND H OUS II .'' r'uId the project; <br />a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, <br />by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, <br />No Impact <br />through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? <br />b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the <br />No Impact <br />constructon of replacement housing elsewhere" <br />Page 7-4 • The Planning Venter <br />Marcb Mar 2009 <br />Resolution No. 2009 -034 <br />Page 102 of 130 <br />