Laserfiche WebLink
- Many youth programming services require signing up or meeting some other referral criteria. <br />Partnerships with community-based nonprofit organizations could fill the gaps in community <br />drop-in services. <br />Soccer programming opportunities include: <br />• Coordinate an annual standardized training for coaches city-wide. <br />- One basic coach training can be offered seasonally by a community college or by one <br />of the larger Cal-Soufh leagues. This would help facilitate a standardization in <br />soccer league practices and expectations and would lead to greater uniformity in <br />participation costs across leagues. <br />• Increase business partnerships. <br />- Increasing public-private partnerships to sponsor soccer leagues could lead to awin- <br />win situation. The burden of costs for league participation would be taken off <br />families and corporate sponsors would garner advertising and positive public <br />relations. This is particularly timely given the city and state's budgetary challenges. <br />• Coordinate all field reservations within the City of Santa Ana through a single entity. <br />- This system would require that a single agency control field distribution; this would <br />effectively streamline the annual soccer field-use reservation process by having both <br />city and school fields coordinated and maintained together. This could also lead to <br />enhanced access for families reporting that transportation to fields is a barrier to <br />their child's participation. <br />• Create a consumer education campaign to educate families about the soccer leagues. <br />- A video in Spanish can be presented to the community on the city website so that <br />families can get a clearer idea of the breadth and scope of the different soccer <br />leagues operating in Santa Ana. This would support parents in making more <br />educated decisions about their child's league participation. <br />• Make soccer programming a priority forthe City. <br />- Soccer engages more Santa Ana youth in intensive physical activity than any other <br />program. Because of this wide-reaching impact, it is important thaf the leagues <br />providing the service are given clear guidelines about expectations to ensure that the <br />highesf levels of participation are met. <br />I. Introduction & purpose of report <br />The City of Santa Ana has a long history of evaluating its parks, recreation and community services. In <br />1980-1981, the City conducted an analysis of recreation needs in order to prepare a guiding policy <br />document that would shape future investments in recreation facilities and programming. In 1992, the City <br />supplemented this research by contracting services with Economics Research Associates and Barrio <br />Planners, Inc. for the creation of A Recreation & Community Services Needs Assessment for the City of <br />Santa Ana, CA 1990-2000. This comprehensive document served to evaluate past recreation <br />programming and provided suggestions forthe establishment of standards the City could use moving <br />forward through the 1990s and 2000s. The document focused on the level of services, the methods to <br />pay for services and funding streams to improve and expand parks and community facilities. At the time <br />of that report, in 1992, Santa Ana operated 38 facilities; 34 parks, 4 school playgrounds, 3 senior centers <br />and 2 community service centers. The consultants at that time found that the City had 1.2 acres of open <br />space per 1,000 residents (in the 1980s, this number was 1.7 acres per 1,000 residents). ~ <br />In 1998, the City of Santa Ana Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency felt that it was <br />appropriate to follow-upon the items identified in the 1992 assessment in a more targeted way. They <br />1 Economics Research Associates and Barrio Planners, Inc. 1992. "A Recreation and Community Services Needs <br />Assessment for the City of Santa Ana, CA." <br /> <br />