CORDOBA CORPORATION 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■ Code networks for each of the following alternative: o Existing (2009) o No- Build (2035) o Transportation Systems Management (2035) o Two (2) Build Alternatives ■ Conduct risk analysis ■ Maintain the model for ongoing applications ■ Prepare model documentation including the following model generated data and measures of effectiveness (MOEs): o System -wide linked trips (and incremental "new" transit trips) o Project boardings o Fixed guideway station -to -station volumes o Mode of access by station o Fixed guideway link volumes all -day and peak hour by direction o Maximum load point volumes o Transit passenger miles of travel o Highway vehicle miles/vehicle hours of travel o Transit travel times o Transit transfers o Highway link volumes and turning movements as reported by the model o Environmental benefits Use Summit to display detailed forecast results on a corridor map for QC and for presentation Deliverable(s) - Travel Demand and Ridership Forecast Report including system wide linked trips, prosect boardings station -to -station boardings and alightings mode -of - access by station link volumes for fixed guideway facilities, peak hour/peak direction volumes at maximum load points passenger -miles of travel highway vehicle hours of travel highway vehicle miles of travel transit travel times number of transfers, highway link volumes turning movements and new transit trlpS Task 5.2 Station Parking Demand and Supply The estimation of parking demand at the proposed station area will be a key element in evaluating potential project impacts, as well as an important element in the development of station design concepts. Based on the Step 1 planning, the Santa Ana Fixed Guideway is likely to serve as both local circulation and commute type trips. It would be anticipated that the greatest parking demand would occur at the terminus stations at the SARTC and at Harbor Boulevard/17th Street. The Cordoba Team will meet with the City and the major stakeholders to review anticipated parking needs for the various users along the corridor, the pros and cons of accommodating each type of parking at station areas, and reasonable strategies for managing parking demand. Using the results of the ridership estimates prepared in Task 5.1 we will develop estimates of potential station area parking demand. We will evaluate opportunities to accommodate forecast demand through station area parking supply, shared parking opportunities, or existing available parking. We will conduct a series of sensitivity analyses to determine the effects of various parking demand management strategies. We will also consider the effects of spill-over parking on the areas immediately surrounding stations. Where applicable, we will consider innovative strategies such as carsharing, unbundled parking supply, dynamic pricing, and others to achieve potential reductions in overall and peak hour parking 131 Page