Laserfiche WebLink
z :r - ~ ~ - , <br /> a „p a T s <br /> s.' k Mn co= <br /> bf <br /> . ~ ,t4 ~ rx <br /> Subtask C.9: Prepare Model Data for Nexus Analysis <br /> 1. Review the current internal boundaries for traffic fee levels, and consider adjustments to the <br /> boundaries if a clearer connection between land use and improvements could be established. <br /> ~ 2. For each subarea, calculate the percentage of trips generated in the overall study area, as well <br /> ~ as the percentage of improvement costs. <br /> 3. Evaluate optional approaches for establishing the nexus between trips and improvement costs, <br /> ~ and identify the specific model data needed. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed that <br /> ~ select link model runs will be used to determine each geographic area's fair share of each <br /> ~ improvement's cost. <br /> ~ 4. Prepare select link model runs using the 2019 and 2035 model to identify origins/destinations <br /> ~ of trips using streets being improved. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed that select <br /> link model data will be developed for 15 improvement projec#s. <br /> 5. Prepare select link model runs using the base year model to identify origins/destinations of <br /> existing trips using streets where improvements in the 2035 scenario are located. <br /> ~ Subtask C.2: Evaluate Internal Area Boundary Alternatives <br /> i . Based on the location of future development and the location of selected street capacity <br /> improvement projects, Identify two internal fee boundary alternatives that meet criteria for a <br /> _ rational nexus. <br /> 2. For each boundary alternative, use the select link data to determine each project's percentage <br /> of traffic attributable to each internal area, and the percentage attributable to through traffic. <br /> Subtask C.3: Identify Fee Levels Supported by Nexus Analysis <br /> ~ For each boundary alternative, calculate fee levels in each area as follows: <br /> 1. Apply the traffic percentages determined in C.2.2 to the cost of each improvement to determine <br /> the fair-share of cost attributable to each area. <br /> 2. Total the fair-share costs of projects for each area. <br /> 3. Calculate the per trip fee for each area, and convert the per-trip fee into a fee per equivalent <br /> single family unit. <br /> Subtask C.4: Compare with Traff1c Fees in Other Jurisdictions <br /> 1. Survey nearby peer Cities with development impact fees for street capacity improvements, and <br /> compare fee levels for different types of land use. <br /> 2. Prepare technical memorandum. <br /> <br /> t~,~ <br /> l'~ <br /> ra In~ro~ss.o9 i~ KimleyHom <br /> andAssoclates,lnc. <br /> 25C-24 <br /> <br />