Laserfiche WebLink
II. Methodology <br />As noted above, the assessment of community resources was multi- faceted. The research design was <br />created to garner input from those who provide regular physical activity opportunities for Santa Ana youth; <br />in particular, community organizations and athletic leagues. This analysis allowed several key themes to <br />emerge from the data, informing the recommendations and opportunities identified later in Section IV. <br />Although multiple methods were implemented (often concurrently) the data analysis that follows is divided <br />into two parts. Part 1 is an assessment of the youth services in Santa Ana with a focus on organizations <br />providing physical activity opportunities. Part 2 focuses exclusively on athletic leagues in Santa Ana, <br />with a deeper analysis of soccer leagues. <br />Youth services assessment methodology <br />The data collection and analysis for the Youth & Family Master Plan took place from August 2008 -June <br />2009. The assessment was a multi- tiered study of the youth services environment, including both <br />qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. This assessment of all youth services provided <br />insights into youth programming networks and environment in Santa Ana. It identified details of particular <br />programs and strategies involving physical activity and gang prevention. The method of identifying <br />participants- the units of analysis- for Phase I was critical to the success of the project. The team tried to <br />balance the need to hear from those that implement the City programs with the desire to hear from the <br />broad -based network of community organizations operating in Santa Ana. Attention was also paid to the <br />needs of youth and the voices of parents whose youth play organized sports (soccer). It is our hope that, <br />given the resources allotted to Phase I, we gleaned the most pertinent information from the analysis. The <br />data collection methods are listed below. <br />Stakeholder interviews & focus groups <br />Focus Groups with City Staff <br />Two focus groups and several individual interviews were conducted with City of Santa Ana staff involved <br />in youth services and programming. Over 30 staff participated in the two focus groups and stakeholder <br />interviews that were held between October 2008 and February 2009. Staff members were recruited <br />through the weekly PRCSA Coordinator's Meetings and snowball sampling of key stakeholders working <br />with youth. These meetings were 1- 1 1/2 hours in length and focused on 1) assessing the current state of <br />youth programming and 2) identifying gaps in youth services. <br />Focus Groups & Interviews with Community Partners <br />One focus group was conducted with staff from community based organizations providing youth physical <br />activity programming in Santa Ana. Although the youth - serving nonprofit community is extensive in <br />Santa Ana, due to the limited scope of Phase I, the invitations to participate were extended only to those <br />organizations providing direct physical activity programming to youth. Twenty organizations identified as <br />providing youth physical activity were invited to participate and a total of 8 individuals attended the focus <br />group and shared their opinions and ideas about how physical activity programming and the built <br />environment could better support healthy children and families in Santa Ana. <br />In an attempt to better understand how community partners are currently working to support a safe and <br />healthy Santa Ana environment for children and families, interviews and /or data collection were also <br />conducted with the following organizations: the Early Prevention and Intervention Commission (EPIC), <br />Community Development Agency, SAPD, Santa Ana Unified School District and Orange County <br />Probation staff. A total of 12 individuals shared their insights and reflections regarding unmet youth and <br />family programming needs. <br />Youth Focus Groups <br />