Laserfiche WebLink
Why Transit - Supportive Zoning? <br />C All good plans for urban renewal include four elements: (1) mixed use <br />development, (2) open space and parks, (3) a strong pedestrian <br />environment that is supported by alternative access -- i.e., effective <br />transit, and (4) affordable housing <br />C Areas that achieve the above reduce vehicle travel by nearly 50 percent <br />C Developers within such areas are more committed to implementing the <br />cities' plans <br />C Greenhouse gas emission reductions are significantly reduced <br />C Public health is improved (people walk more, air quality improves) <br />C Businesses thrive (people live, work, dine and shop in the same area) <br />C Adopting Transit - Supportive Zoning will help our Fixed Guideway project <br />better compete for funding: <br />C By increasing ridership projections <br />C Providing a stronger linkage between transportation & land use <br />Santa Ana Transit Master Plan Major Activity & Deliverables <br />(Fall!! 2009 <br />Winter <br />Spring 2010 <br />Summer <br />(Fall!! 2010 <br />Winter <br />Spring <br />Summer <br />(Fall!! 2011 <br />2009 -10 <br />2010 <br />2010 -11 <br />2011 <br />2011 <br />IFixed Fixed <br />Goal setting <br />Council <br />Public <br />Conceptual <br />Council <br />Potential <br />Public <br />City <br />Guideway <br />Data <br />selects <br />scoping <br />engineering <br />receives <br />funding <br />Council <br />study gets <br />collection <br />technology <br />Environmental <br />AA Study <br />sources <br />selects <br />Early <br />and <br />analysis <br />Locally <br />consultation <br />alignment <br />Ridership <br />Preferred <br />and <br />alternatives <br />forecasting <br />Alternative <br />coordination <br />for <br />Cost <br />OCTA <br />with <br />Alternatives <br />estimates <br />funding <br />Coordination <br />with <br />stakeholders <br />Preliminary <br />Environmental <br />SARTC <br />SARTC <br />SARTC <br />& <br />Detailed <br />design <br />assessment <br />Master <br />OCTA <br />Final <br />Master <br />Master <br />Station <br />concept <br />Funding <br />Plan <br />funding <br />design <br />District <br />presented to <br />source <br />adopted <br />master <br />(Fall!! 2009 <br />Winter <br />Spring 2010 <br />Summer <br />(Fall!! 2010 <br />Winter <br />Spring <br />Summer <br />(Fall!! 2011 <br />2009 -10 <br />2010 <br />2010 -11 <br />2011 <br />2011 <br />Santa Area Bllvd. <br />Consultant <br />field survey <br />Draft <br />Conceptual <br />Preliminary <br />Compl <br />Draft <br />PSRE <br />Grade Separation <br />selection <br />and data <br />conceptual <br />Alignments <br />environmental <br />eted <br />PSRE <br />approved <br />and <br />collection <br />Alignments <br />finalized <br />review started <br />conce <br />subrnitte <br />by City <br />awalyd of <br />Utility Survey <br />submitted <br />Preliminary <br />Draft cost <br />ptual <br />d <br />contract by <br />Obtain <br />for <br />design <br />estimate <br />design <br />for <br />requirements <br />(review <br />concept <br />Alternatives <br />drawln <br />(review <br />from SCRRA, <br />Geotechnic <br />presented to <br />analysis and y <br />g <br />Distribute <br />Caltlrans, <br />al <br />structural type <br />Final <br />PSRE to <br />OCTA and <br />investigatin <br />selection for <br />cost <br />PUC <br />g <br />estima <br />Begin <br />Hydrology <br />to <br />identifying <br />Hydraulic <br />Finaliz <br />analysis <br />e <br />Traffic <br />envilro <br />Survey <br />m <br />ment <br />Design <br />al <br />constraints <br />review <br />review <br />Community <br />outlreach <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />9 <br />JANUARY 19, 2010 <br />10A <br />-9 <br />