My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
T & B PLANNING (2) - 2010
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
T
>
T & B PLANNING (2) - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2017 2:37:36 PM
Creation date
4/21/2010 2:50:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
T & B PLANNING
Contract #
A-2010-040
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
3/1/2010
Expiration Date
6/30/2011
Insurance Exp Date
2/1/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposal for San Lorenzo Lift Station EIR <br />Prepared for: CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />EXHIBIT B: SCOPE OF WORK <br />- Growth Inducement <br />- Hazards <br />- Noise* <br />- Traffic <br />* Based in part on an accompanying technical report (refer to Phase 3 of this proposal). <br />The above topics will be addressed in the following general manner. The existing <br />conditions /environmental setting as it relates specifically to the environmental topic under <br />evaluation will be described to establish a baseline for conducting the environmental <br />analysis. As necessary and appropriate, a description of key terminology and concepts <br />associated with the environmental issue area will be presented. Next, the significance criteria <br />will be listed and will be accompanied by a justification as to the appropriateness of the <br />criteria selected for evaluation. An analysis will then be presented for each significance <br />criteria, and the analysis will provide a clear description and conclusion as to the level of <br />significance of project impacts, prior to mitigation. The analysis also will include a <br />discussion of potential cumulative impacts, which are defined as those which by themselves <br />may not result in significant impacts but when combined with similar impacts from existing, <br />approved- but - not - yet -built or planned projects would be cumulatively significant. T &B <br />Planning will work with City of Santa Ana staff to identify surrounding projects to be <br />included in the cumulative impacts analysis. For each significant impact identified, feasible <br />and enforceable mitigation measures will be presented. Finally, each chapter in this section <br />will provide a conclusion as to the level of significance following implementation of <br />recommended mitigation measures. <br />Project Alternatives. The Alternative Analysis section will be based on a description of <br />reasonable project alternatives defined in consultation with City staff. Each alternative <br />identified in this section will be intended to meet the project's primary objectives while <br />minimizing or eliminating significant environmental effects associated with the proposed <br />project. The No- Project Alternative will be evaluated as required by CEQA. Additionally, <br />an Alternative Sites analysis will be required. We will look to City staff to assist us in <br />determining the feasibility and effects of not completing the project (No Project Alternative) <br />or placing the lift station in an alternate location (Alternative Sites). <br />References. This required section will identify all reference sources used and persons <br />contacted in order to prepare the EIR. <br />Upon completion of the Administrative Draft EIR, the EIR document and its supporting technical <br />reports will be forwarded to the City for review. <br />Task 4.2 - Prepare Second Administrative Draft EIR <br />Based on City of Santa Ana staff review of the First Administrative Draft EIR document, T &B <br />Planning will revise the EIR document to respond to City comments, questions and requests for <br />clarification. This proposal anticipates that comments will be minor to moderate in scope and <br />complexity. For the purpose of creating a budget for this task, we assume that the City will not <br />require substantial changes to the Project Description or request substantial expansions to any <br />technical studies prepared by project team members in support of the EIR. Once the revisions have <br />been incorporated, we will submit a Second Administrative Draft EIR to the City for a final review in <br />Page B -8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.