Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br /> COUNCIL ACTION <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br /> MAY 3, 2010 <br /> TITLE: APPROVED <br /> ? As Recommended <br /> AGREEMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ? As Amended <br /> ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING, INC. ? Ordinance on 1ST Reading <br /> ? Ordinance on 2"d Reading <br /> FOR FATS, OILS, & GREASE PROGRAM ? Implementing Resolution <br /> MANAGEMENT SERVICES ? Set Public Hearing For <br /> CONTINUED TO <br /> f <br /> 'J _;~'/ri~ FILE NUMBER <br /> CITY MANAGER <br /> RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached agreement with <br /> Environmental Engineering and Contracting, Inc., subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the <br /> City Manager and City Attorney to provide fats, oils, and grease control program management <br /> services in an amount not to exceed $180,000. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> In October 2004, the City adopted an ordinance amending Chapter 39 of the Santa Ana Municipal <br /> Code to control the discharge of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) from food service establishments to the <br /> City's sewer collection system. In January 2005, the Public Works Agency began implementation of <br /> a comprehensive FOG control program that includes regular inspections of all food service <br /> establishments to insure compliance with the ordinance. The FOG ordinance and program are <br /> required by the California State Water Quality Control Board. <br /> Requests for Proposals were sent to six firms. The services that the consultants were asked to <br /> provide on an as-needed basis included inspection of new food service establishments (FSEs), <br /> <br /> training and support of City Sanitation Inspectors, support and maintenance of the FSE database, <br /> coordination with other agencies to insure compliance with regulatory requirements, and technical <br /> <br /> support to City staff for all FOG-related issues. <br /> One response was received and evaluated by athree-member selection committee. The sealed fee <br /> <br /> envelope was then opened and the fee proposal was analyzed. Listed below is the rating of the <br /> responsive firm. <br /> RATING FEE <br /> Environmental Engineering and Contracting, Inc. 96 See Exhibit 2 <br /> 25H-1 <br /> <br />