Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 12 Responses to Comments Received Since Publication of the Final EIR <br />Response to Comment AQMD -3 <br />This comment requests that the City provide AQMD with written responses to the comments set forth <br />in this letter prior to certification of the EIR for this project. The City will provide the AQMD with a <br />written response to these comments before the public hearing on the project. <br />Response to Comment AQMD -4 <br />Refer to response AMQD -2. <br />Response to Comment AQMD -5 <br />The commenter states that the City should consider developing criteria to determine the "availability ", <br />"cost effectiveness ", and /or "feasibility" of the use of construction methods or equipment that would <br />help to reduce construction- related pollutant emissions. Since this programmatic EIR is analyzing long - <br />range future development, it is not feasible to determine the criteria that the commenter suggests. <br />Technologies change as do costs. As indicated in the MMRP prepared for the project, future entitlements <br />by the City prior to the issuance of grading or building permits will be required. Therefore, the <br />appropriateness of these measures can better be determined at such time. Thus, the City does not <br />consider the development of these criteria to be feasible mitigation at the time of this writing. <br />Response to Comment AQMD -6 <br />The commenter suggests several additional mitigation measures. The first suggestion is to re -route <br />construction equipment away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas. MM4.2 -15 sets forth <br />mitigation to ensure smooth traffic flow. Also, in the FEIR, the following text change was added to the <br />Transportation Section: <br />In addition, any work that proposes to excavate, improve or otherwise occur in a public street <br />sidewalk_ or any other public place will be required to obtain a permit from the Public Works <br />Department. One of the requirements to obtain a permit as outlined in Section 33- 32(a)(71 of the <br />Municipal Code is the preparation of a construction work plan that is approved by the City Traffic <br />Engineer. This includes identif&g lane closures, their duration, the means for traffic safety <br />control, the types and number of traffic delineators, schedule, hours of operation, etc. Compliance <br />with the City's Noise Ordinance and the Municipal Code will prevent any significant impacts to <br />local roadways or on the nearby school. <br />Attainment of the aforementioned permit will require a construction work plan as stated above. The <br />provisions thereof will ensure that the City Traffic Engineer will grant a permit at which time traffic <br />disruption is determined to be at the minimum possible levels. <br />In regard to the other suggested mitigation measures, as is standard practice, the City included the <br />mitigation measures that are listed in the URBEMIS model since they are calculated into the "mitigated" <br />model output. <br />However, the City concurs and will add the following mitigation measures to reduce Impact 4.2 -5, <br />identified in Section 4.2 of the DEIR although the reductions (f any) are not quantifiable. <br />12 -8 City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) EIR <br />