My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
80A - SUPPLEMENTAL - SANTA ANA TRANSITZONINGCODE POST- RESPONSE TO COMMENTS - FEIR
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
06/07/2010
>
80A - SUPPLEMENTAL - SANTA ANA TRANSITZONINGCODE POST- RESPONSE TO COMMENTS - FEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 5:27:55 PM
Creation date
6/10/2010 12:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
80A
Date
6/7/2010
Destruction Year
P
Notes
supplemental EIR Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 12 Responses to Comments Received Since Publication of the Final EIR <br />City of Del Mar P. City of San Diego [1982] 133 Cal.App.3d 401) Refer to the City /Agency's Findings on <br />Mitigation Measures Proposed to Reduce Impacts to Cultural Resources in the Findings of Fact and <br />Statement of Overriding Considerations for a further discussion. <br />Response to Comment BHLG -5 <br />This comment appears to reference Figure 5 -1 (Demolitions) contained on p. 5 -6 of the Recirculated <br />Chapter 5 (Alternatives) of the EIR. The comment states that "at least 10" of the structures identified in <br />Figure 5 -1 should be rehabilitated in place, if feasible, or moved within the Lacy Neighborhood. The <br />comment does not specify which structures should be rehabilitated or moved. Note that there are a very <br />limited number of designated historic resources in the Lacy Neighborhood (see Draft EIR Figure 4.4 -1 <br />[Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties within the Transit Zoning Code Area]), and the <br />neighborhood itself has not been designated as historic. Additionally, mitigation measure MM4.4 -3 <br />would reduce impacts to historic resources throughout the Transit Zoning Code Area to the extent <br />feasible. Preservation of ten of the existing structures proposed for demolition in the Lacy <br />Neighborhood is not feasible because it will inhibit the City's ability to meet its affordable housing goals. <br />Construction of affordable housing units is critical to meeting the City's Regional Housing Needs <br />Assessment (RHNA) for 2006 -2014, and the City has an adopted policy to "maximize affordable housing <br />on Agency -owned properties that is of high quality, sustainable, and available to various income levels." <br />(Refer to Santa Ana Housing Element [2006- 2014], Policy HE -2.8.) Additionally, preservation of certain <br />properties within the Lacy Neighborhood may inhibit the City's ability to "encourage the construction of <br />rental housing for Santa Ana's residents and workforce, including a commitment to very low, low and <br />moderate income residents and moderate income Santa Ana workers" (Policy HE -2.3) and to fulfill its <br />policy to "facilitate and encourage a diversity and range in types, prices, and sizes of housing, including <br />single - family homes, apartments, town homes, mixed /multiuse housing, transit- oriented developments, <br />and live /work housing" (Policy HE -2.4). (Refer to Santa Ana Housing Element [2006- 2014].) Further, <br />preservation of all of ten of the existing structures proposed for demolition in the Lacy Neighborhood <br />would be inconsistent with the primary objectives of the proposed Developer Project to "redevelop all of <br />the Agency -owned properties" and "provide new affordable housing for families in furtherance of the <br />City's affordable housing goals established in the Housing Element, the Implementation Plan for the <br />Santa Ana Merged Redevelopment Project Area, and the City of Santa Ana Consolidated Plan." The <br />infeasibility of Alternatives 4, 5 and 6 is discussed in the City /Agency's Findings Regarding Project <br />Alternatives in the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. <br />Response to Comment BHLG -6 <br />It is unclear from this comment what is meant by the properties not having been "inspected." All of the <br />properties currently owned by the Redevelopment Agency have been inspected numerous times to <br />determine their safety and suitability, as well as to allow for the salvage of architectural details by <br />volunteer groups. Most recently the properties were inspected for purposes of determining estimated <br />rehabilitation costs that were used in Appendix J, the Keyser Marston Analysis, which analyzed the <br />economic feasibility of Alternatives 4, 5, and 6. Further, the properties identified for demolition on <br />parcels currently owned by the Agency have been the subject of "windshield" surveys to determine their <br />potential eligibility for listing as a historic resource. (Refer to Draft EIR Section 4.4 and Appendix D.) <br />Specifically, in 2006, HRG conducted a reconnaissance -style survey and historic research project in <br />City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) EIR 12 -23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.