My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
URS CORPORATION 1A (2) -2008
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
U
>
URS CORPORATION 1A (2) -2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2020 12:28:04 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 12:22:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
URS CORPORATION
Contract #
A-2008-048-01
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Insurance Exp Date
4/1/2018
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
representatives to ultimately confirm the type and location of noise abatement the church would <br />require for project approval. The results of the coordination are detailed in the project's NADR. <br />Task 5. Update Traffic Impact Analysis <br />Per Caltrans' e-mail direction dated March 8, 2010, the Traffic Impact Analysis needs to be <br />updated / remodeled for the year 2035 using a straight-line projection method using a City - <br />approved traffic growth factor. It is assumed that the existing year will remain as 2008. The text <br />of the existing Traffic Impact Analysis will be updated as necessary. It is assumed that the City <br />and Caltrans will review the updated report concurrently, and Caltrans will require a maximum <br />of one round of revisions to approve this study. It is also assumed that a total of no more than 10 <br />copies of the revised traffic impact analysis will need to be reproduced. <br />Task 6. Update Noise Analysis <br />Utilizing the results of the updated Traffic Impact Analysis, a memorandum will prepared that <br />qualitatively documents that the results of the updated traffic analysis (e.g., changes in volumes) <br />will not affect the already performed impact analyses and mitigation (abatement) requirements. <br />The memorandum will be reviewed concurrently by the City and Caltrans. This scope of work <br />does not include updating the Caltrans approved Noise Study Report or Noise Abatement <br />Decision Report above and beyond changing the project description in each report. Therefore, it <br />is assumed that Caltrans will not perform a formal round of review of either one of the <br />aforementioned noise studies as part of updating the noise analysis. It is also assumed that a total <br />of no more than 10 copies of the noise impact analysis memorandum will need to be reproduced. <br />Task 7. Air Quality Conformity Finding — Southern California Association of Governments <br />Coordination <br />The project will be re -presented to the Southern California Association of Governments' <br />Transportation Conformity Working Group utilizing the traffic data generated as a result of the <br />updated Traffic Impact Analysis (see Task 5). URS will coordinate directly with SCAG's TCWG <br />to agendize the project to confirm that it is not a Project of Air Quality Concern. If deemed <br />necessary, Caltrans will request an updated conformity determination from the Federal Highway <br />Administration. This scope of work does not include updating the Caltrans approved Air Quality <br />Study or Air Quality Conformity Analysis above and beyond changing the project description in <br />each report. Therefore, it is assumed that Caltrans will not perform a formal round of review of <br />either one of the aforementioned air quality studies. It is also assumed that a total of no more <br />than 5 copies each of the Air Quality Study or Air Quality Conformity Analysis that include the <br />revised project description. <br />Task 8. Update Other Technical Studies <br />This task includes updating the project descriptions in the technical studies not otherwise <br />described above. This includes the Relocation Impact Statement; Community Impact <br />Assessment; Historic Property Survey Report and Historic Resources Evaluation Report; and <br />Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts). It is assumed that revisions to the project <br />description write-ups of these technical studies will not require a formal round of review by <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.