Laserfiche WebLink
Guidelines Followed: <br /> The Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) formed a work group, which <br /> prepared guidelines for water utilities to use in preparing these required reports. The ACWA <br /> guidelines were used in the preparation of this report. <br /> Best Available Technology and Cost Estimates: <br /> Both the USEPA and CDPH adopt what are known as BATs or Best Available <br /> Technology, which are the best known methods of reducing contaminant levels to the MCL. <br /> Costs can be estimated for such technologies. However, since many PHGs and all MCLGs are <br /> set lower than the MCL, it is not always possible nor feasible to determine what treatment is <br /> needed to further reduce a constituent downward to or near the PHG or MCLG, many of which <br /> are set at zero. Estimating the costs to reduce a constituent to zero is difficult, if not impossible <br /> because it is not possible to verify by analytical means that the level has been lowered to zero. In <br /> some cases, installing treatment to try and further reduce very low levels of one constituent may <br /> have adverse effects on other aspects of water quality. <br /> Constituents Detected That Exceed a PHG or a MCLG: <br /> The following is a discussion of constituents that were detected in one or more of our <br /> drinking water sources at levels above PHG. <br /> Naturally Occurring Uranium <br /> The PHG for Natural Uranium is 0.43 pCi/L. The MCL or drinking water standard for <br /> Natural Uranium is 20 pCi/L. We have detected Natural Uranium in 18 of our 21 wells at levels <br /> 1.16 to 9.49 pCi/L. The levels detected were below the MCL. The category of health risk <br /> associated with Natural Uranium, and the reason that a drinking water standard was adopted for <br /> it, is that people who drink water containing Natural Uranium above the MCL throughout their <br /> lifetime could experience an increased risk of cancer. The 20 pCi/L MCL established by the <br /> CDPH if complied with should have no adverse health effect. The numerical risk for cancer for <br /> water containing Uranium at the PHG level of 0.43 pCi/L is one case in 1,000,000. The large <br /> water system BAT for Natural Uranium to lower the levels below the PHG is Ion Exchange. <br /> Total water production for all affected wells is 41,505 gallons per minute. Based on the USEPA <br /> studies, the initial cost to treat one thousand gallons of water at 80 percent removal efficiency for <br /> large water systems ranges from $0.53 to $0.68. The on going cost for the treatment ranges from <br /> $0.53 to $0.68 per thousand gallons of water treated. For the City of Santa Ana, the estimated <br /> cost to install such treatment systems (Ion Exchange) ranges between $6.78 and $21.6 Million. <br /> The cost to operate the treatment facilities will range from $6.78 to $8.3 million per year. The <br /> cost to build the treatment facilities would result in an assumed increased cost for each customer <br /> <br /> of $19.48 to $60.41 in the first year and from $19.45 to $23.87 per customer annually. <br /> pEX~HI~BiT~1 <br /> I Fi~~'~F4 <br /> <br />