My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - RPT ON WATER QUALITY RELATIVE TO PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
07/06/2010
>
75C - PH - RPT ON WATER QUALITY RELATIVE TO PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:02:42 PM
Creation date
7/1/2010 8:58:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75C
Date
7/6/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Copper <br /> The PHG for copper is 0.3 mg/L. There is no MCL for Copper. Instead the 90th <br /> percentile value of all samples from household taps in the distribution system cannot exceed an <br /> Action Level of 1.3 mg/L for copper. <br /> The category of health risk for copper is gastrointestinal irritation. Numerical health risk <br /> data on copper have not yet been provided by OEHHA, the State agency responsible for <br /> providing that information. <br /> All of our source water samples for copper in 2009 were less than the PHG. Based on <br /> extensive sampling of our distribution system in 2009, our 90th percentile value for copper was <br /> 0.19 mg/L. <br /> Our water system is in full compliance with the Federal and State Lead and Copper Rule. <br /> Based on our extensive sampling, it was determined according to State Regulatory requirements <br /> that we meet the Action Levels for copper. Therefore, we are deemed by CDPH to have <br /> "Optimized Corrosion Control" for our system. <br /> In general, optimizating corrosion control is considered to be the best available <br /> technology to deal with corrosion issues and with any lead or copper findings. We continue to <br /> monitor our water quality parameters that relate to corrosively, such as pH, hardness, alkalinity, <br /> and total dissolved solids. Action will be taken if necessary to maintain our system in an <br /> "Optimized Corrosion Control" condition. <br /> Since we are meeting the "Optimized Corrosion Control" requirements, it is not prudent <br /> to initiate additional corrosion control treatment as it involves the addition of other chemicals, <br /> and there could be additional water quality issues raised. Therefore, no estimate of cost has been <br /> included. <br /> Arsenic <br /> The PHG for arsenic is 0.000004 mg/L. The MCL for arsenic is 0.10 mg/L. We have <br /> detected Arsenic in 3 of our 21 wells at levels ND - 0.0049 mg/L. The levels detected were <br /> below the MCL. The category of health risk associated with Arsenic, and the reason that a <br /> drinking water standard was adopted for it, is that people who drink water containing Arsenic <br /> above the MCL throughout their lifetime could experience an increased risk of cancer. The 0.10 <br /> mg/L MCL established by the USEPA if complied with should have no health effect. The <br /> numerical risk for cancer for water containing Arsenic at the PHG level of 0.000004 mg/L is one <br /> case in 1,000,000. The large system BAT for Arsenic to lower the levels below the PHG is Ion <br /> Exchange. Total water production for all affected wells is 7,349 gallons per minute. Based on <br /> the USEPA studies, the initial cost to treat one thousand gallons of water at 80 percent removal <br /> efficiency for large water systems ranges from $0.53 to $0.68. The on going cost for the <br /> treatment ranges from $0.53 to $0.68 per thousand gallons of water treated. For the City of <br /> Santa Ana, the estimated cost to install such treatment systems (Ion Exchange) ranges between <br /> $6.78 and $21.6 Million. The cost to operate the treatment facilities will range from $6.78 to <br /> $8.3 million per year. The cost to build the treatment facilities would result in an assumed <br /> increased to each customer or $19.48 to $60.41 in the first year and from $19.45 to $23.87 per <br /> <br /> customer annually. <br /> EXHIBIT 1 <br /> ~~~~4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.