My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-002 CRA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
2010-2012
>
2010
>
2010-002 CRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:20:47 PM
Creation date
7/7/2010 12:33:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
CRA 2010-02
Date
6/7/2010
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Protect Alternatives <br />~ Rehabilitation of Potential New Acquisitions Alternative <br />In this alternative, the Redevelopment Agency would acquire properties within the Developer Project in <br />order to complete blocks where the Agency already has an ownership interest, as it would under the <br />proposed Developer Project. However, instead of demolishing these structures, the Redevelopment <br />Agency would rehabilitate them in place. <br />Findings <br />The Agency hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological ox other considerations make <br />the adoption of this alternative infeasible. This alternative would prevent redevelopment of Agency- <br />owned properties, a key project objective of the Developer Project. It would also substantially limit the <br />opportunity to provide new affordable housing for families in furtherance of the City's affordable <br />housing goals established in the Housing Element, the Implementation Plan fox the Santa Ana Merged <br />Redevelopment Project Area, and the City of Santa Ana Consolidated Plan. Further it would not enhance <br />the streetscape and urban form of the area, particularly along Santa Ana Boulevard, with the construction <br />of new buildings that meet the standards contained in the Transit Zorting Code and that support future <br />transit planning. Nor would it secure provision of public open space or facilitation of a joint use <br />arrangement with SAUSD fox a new community center. Finally, it would not provide an economically <br />viable redevelopment scenario for the Agency-owned properties. Additionally, it would result in the <br />elimination of an opportunity to provide new quality housing. As a result, if demolition of the properties <br />that may be acquired by the Agency were precluded, the Redevelopment Agency would not pursue their <br />acquisition, and the benefits of the Developer Project, including the creation of new public open space, <br />the elurunation of blight, and an enhancement of the streetscape, would not be realized. <br />3.4.4 Additional Findings <br />~ Findings Related to Clarifications and Updates to the Draft EIR <br />Chapter 3 of the Final EIR includes the comments received on the Draft EIR and responses to those <br />comments. The focus of the responses to comments is on the disposition of significant environmental <br />issues as raised in the comments, as specified by CEQA Guidelines ~ 15088(b). Additionally, as a result <br />of refinements to the proposed Developer Project since publication of the Draft EIR, the allocation of <br />rental of units and fox sale units that would be constructed under the proposed Developer Project and <br />under Alternatives 4, 5 and 6 has been slightly modified. The February 23, 2010 financial analysis <br />prepared by Keyser Marston Associates that was included as Appendix J to the EIR has been updated to <br />reflect these modifications. The updated financial analysis, dated May 22, 2010, is included as Appendix J <br />to the Final EIR. <br />Findings <br />Responses to comments made on the Draft EIR and revisions to the Final EIR merely clarify and <br />amplify the analysis presented in the EIR and do not trigger the need to recirculate per CEQA Guide- <br />lines ~15088.5(b). Similarly, the refined reallocation of rental and fox sale residential units that would be <br />provided by the Developer Project and the updates to the Keyser Marston Associates financial analysis <br />Transit Zoning Code (SD 84) EIR Findings of Fact,/Statement of Overriding Considerations 3-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.