|
27
<br />MUNICIPAL RECORDS
<br />§ 14.14
<br />vate litigant in the absence of considerations i vol g life or liber-
<br />ty.
<br />36
<br />'Louisiana. Trahan v. Larive (La
<br />App), 365 So2d 294 (liberal construction
<br />of laws concerning aces to public
<br />records).
<br />New York, Chambers NF. dent Wise),
<br />201 NYS2d 433.
<br />2 Massachusetts. Hastings & Boas
<br />Pub. Co. v. Citi Treasurer of Lynn, 374
<br />Mass 812, 375 NE2d 299 (disclosure o
<br />public payroll records).
<br />Ohio. Dayton Newspapers, pers, Inc. v.
<br />Ayton, 45 Ohio St 2d 107, 341 NE2d 576
<br />(city jail log); State v. Boit, 42 Ohio St2d
<br />493, 339 NE2d 442 (school records dis-
<br />closing student navies).
<br />Wisconsin. State v. Owens, 28 Wis2d
<br />72, 137 N 2d 470.
<br />*3 Illinois. People v. Deane, 17 111
<br />pp3d 1090, 309 NE2d 362 (cable tele%pi-
<br />sion franchise applicants' financial
<br />records). '
<br />Iowa. Telegrapb Herald, Inc. v. Du-
<br />buque (Iowa), 297 NW2d 529 (tape re-
<br />cordings of closed council sessions hold in
<br />violation of open meetings law).
<br />New York. New York Post Corp. v.
<br />'loses, 23 Misc2d 826, 204 NYS2d 44.
<br />Washington. Cohen v_ Everett City
<br />Council, 85 Wash2d 385, 635 P2d 801
<br />(minutes of executive session concerning
<br />revocation of sauna 1 icense1.
<br />Georgia. Doe v. Sears, 245 Ga 83,
<br />263 SEM 119 ropers records lavv applica-
<br />ble to city housing authority).
<br />New York. New York: Post Corp, v.
<br />Moses. 12 App DIv2d 243, 210 NYS2d 8S.
<br />Pennsylvania. Philadelphia v. lam,
<br />45 Pa CmwItb 659, 405 A2d 1317 (records
<br />of delinquent real estate taxpayers).
<br />'s New York. Van Allen v. McCleary,
<br />27 Nhsc2d 81, 211 NYS2d 50L
<br />Ohio. State v. Bob, 42 Ohio St2d 493,
<br />339 NE2d 442 (pupils' names and lists of
<br />coup taken). -
<br />6 Ur"it d States. )(McCoy v. Providence
<br />Journal Co., 190 F2d 7 GO (lists containing
<br />tax cancellations or abatements).
<br />Connecticut. State v. Shall} 126
<br />Conn 636, 12 A2d 767.
<br />Florida. Williams v. State, 128 Fla
<br />668,175 So 235 (statutory right limited to
<br />state citizens, mandamus denied); Lee v.
<br />ach Pub. Co., 127 Fla 600, 173 So 440
<br />(police department records, inspection by
<br />news publishing company); State v. Pace,
<br />118 Fla 496, 159 So 679, citing McQuiIIin
<br />text.
<br />Georgia, Savannah v. Foltz, 32 Ga
<br />App 73, 122 SE 643 (only photographic
<br />copies available).
<br />Illinois. People v. amu, 403 111232, 85
<br />NE2d 629 (city, comptroller's annual stat -
<br />tory report).
<br />Indiana: Evansville- 'anderburgh
<br />County Dept. of Health v. Evansville
<br />Printing Corp., 165 Ind App 437, 332
<br />NEM 829 (death certificates).
<br />Missouri. Disabled Police veterans
<br />Club Y. Long (Io App), 279 SNY2d 220
<br />(records required by statute).
<br />New Hampshire' 'Segre v. Ding, 102
<br />NH 556, 163 A2d 4 dease between town
<br />and individual).
<br />New Jersey. Moore v. Board. of Cho-
<br />sen
<br />hoµs n Freeholders of County of Mercer, 76
<br />NJ Super 396, 184 A2d 748.
<br />New Fork. Werf l v. Fitzgerald, 23
<br />App Div2d 306,260 NYS2d 791 (criminal
<br />court clerk records i3 New York Post
<br />Corp. v. Moses, 12 App Iii v2d 243, 210
<br />N Y 2d 88 1con tracts, and records dealing
<br />with leaves of abs rices granted tocer-
<br />tain employees); Uvalde Asphalt Paving
<br />Co, v. New York, 149 App Div 391, 134
<br />NYS 50; Van Allen v_ McCleary, 27
<br />I i c2d 81, 211 NYS2d 601 (school
<br />records); Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Hoyt,
<br />202 Mi c 43, 107 NYS2d 756 (records and
<br />papers in all municipal departments ex -
<br />pt police and law departments), Han-
<br />sen v. McNamara, 196 Mise 661, 9
<br />NYS2d 6161mod ified on another ground,
<br />276 App Div 1009, 95 NYS2d 904) (veter-
<br />ans" applications to civil ser%ice commis-
<br />sion for preference); Sia v. Lincoln Hos-
<br />1.1
<br />
|