Laserfiche WebLink
14,14a MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS e3 <br />New York. Cherkis v. ImPellitt ri, ' hln t'on. State v. oodsell149 <br />307 1 32,, 120 , <br />� V d 63-0 (taxpayer's <br />pal}�*'f'y <br />inspection <br />xrrspect�on dC-iti r i1Fa]F�.+Ji report to <br />�uYa. <br />�+[ 70 7 <br />Wash <br />��Gi�■#1r�]'f2Y��.�•{if �'i+l. <br />Mandamus ch <br />3.ri�1Y�{�l��T� i, <br />Commissioner); )} eFl�* ��.Board ti+l Y0i+�A <br />New <br />��n <br />�a <br />tiii+# VL New York (Mise), 141 �YV <br />Corp.ff <br />ifd # /+YTi1 #,-�fk s11�3.r •hR J1�Y� /, A <br />Moses, �F,1 App i�� i./� #rt + f if�Y � �J i.l <br />(taxpayer's88. <br />\4axpa e ` # sPecti n denied as toboard <br />of education records). <br />W'ScOnsi . State v. Owens, 2 <br />29 Alabama! Holcombe v. State, 240 Wis2d 672� 137 W2d 4'7 3. <br />R <br />Ala 490, 200 So 739. <br />32 New York. New York Post Corp. v. <br />Colorado. Stocknan v. Brooks, 17 Moses, 12 App Dig2d 243, 210 N YS2d ; <br />Colo 243, 29 P <br />So a va Lincoln Hospital ofit R of New <br />Connecticut. State v. Schall, 126 YDrk, 190 Misc 448, 74 NYS2d 184 (cit' T <br />Conn 536, 12 A2d 767. <br />bospital records for possible use bas is <br />Florida. State v. Pace, 118 Fla 496, <br />of suit against city). <br />159 So 679, citing McQuillin text. <br />F <br />Iowa, Keokuk v. Merriam, 44 Iowa <br />Tennessee. State %,.Williams, 110 <br />7!-{� Term y}-{yp �}y <br />432; Rexv.Bayb`[b, Feer Rep i <br />nrin�y �f9Q t [� Q <br />viii 2a1, 75 4�� t/4C.%. <br />3 Wisconsin, <br />Kentucky.4. <br />T <br />#•i Ytch � • Middlesboro, 4il <br />tato. i+y�+` a •A{�8 <br />, VR�ii1� i/V <br />#`} <br />y ±i4ry'/J7 /y�}{ /%} SW <br />Y, • <br />�++*//#� <br />•f/Y�_ J�af4/ <br />/'i]'I/.}r yi���%f NW <br />�]�� 672,137 <br />1� ZL�� Y F � � Y • � 1 T�+M� 4 a <br />Vhfa - <br />1C.4ssacbS.LsILtti7. Hobart �t, Commis-�� <br />##��jjV ��yy <br />iy� #x i 7+� Y - <br />ply Hampshire. <br />L-�T* €is-1���3t1 �a f i�l�� � !*, L71 �' <br />* <br />sioner o Corporations . Taxation, 31 <br />cub, 100 NH 3,12 i2d 94 fproduc- <br />Ma 341, 41 N2d 38; Hurley N'. hoard of <br />t''on of C'Ws insurance Wick• in tort ac- <br />'ublrc Welfare of Lynn, 310 Mass 285, 3 7 <br />N 2d 993 (allowing taxpayer to examine <br />e' w York. Tingling v. -Lang, 39 <br />public welfare records). <br />Afis 2d 338, 240 NYS2d 633 (notes, rne - <br />A ichl an. Non;rack Y. Fuller, 243 <br />oranda, etc., i <br />in course of job air alyses by <br />Mich 200, 219 NW 749, 60 ALR 1351. <br />civil service commission); Sears Roebuck <br />New Hampshire. Segre v. Ring, 102 <br />Vff 556, 163 A2d 4. <br />& Co. v. Hc�vt, 202 Alisc 43, 107 I Y 2d <br />New Jersey. State v. Williams, 41 <br />756 (city assessor's tax records); Blumkin <br />v. New York, 183 Mise c 31, 4"7 NYS2d <br />NJ 332, x pante Arnold. 160 3, Tax <br />492, <br />(police records, for use in action to <br />payers Assn ofCape Nja , Ne • Jersey* 7tR, <br />Cape Alay, 2 NJ Super 27, 64 A d 453. <br />recov- <br />er riot damages). <br />New York. Deville v. Board o€` <br />Ohio. In re tori*, � Chao t 144, � 11 <br />Health, 2 bb New Cases { fiY) 9 ward <br />� 2d 3 5 (police records, upon taking of <br />of health records); Farr Alen v. hoc. <br />deposition in civil suit). <br />Clea, 21 Misc2d 81. 211 NYS2d .501;� <br />r' 1, <br />New York. In re Bakers Mut. Ins. <br />Marlin Holding Corp. v. Tax Commission <br />Co. of New York, 301 NY 21, 92 N2d 49 <br />of New York.. 206 #isc 218, 3r 1\-ys2d <br />tcvn#idential medical report to health de - <br />6 -07 fln pection of amen# records <br />pai`tment treated as privileged am uni- <br />corn penled c, Sears Roebuck Co. v. o�'t. <br />atrOr�#. <br />202 disc 43. for NY 2d 766, Blandford <br />36 California. San Prance o v_ upe- <br />•. lcClelIan. 173 M IiscX15, 16 N YS2d 919. <br />v. Cleveland, 4 bio <br />hjo7. <br />rior Court, 38 Cal2d 156, M P d 581 <br />295,!]�S�"�t�a t2d <br />,{#� <br />2d 665- <br />1wage-rate data obtained from private <br />ern* er-s bY civil service commission), <br />14.14a. ' Copyi11g. <br />Th e right to inspect Public records carries with it the rrr rn a ke <br />copies..' Regulations; may � go <br />require, however, tie p}+c f <br />eming expenses. 2 Th e Common -1a w right to ins ect an <br />