|
full
<br />that,
<br />Tsuch
<br />iosed.
<br />:1 held
<br />a law
<br />. ilure
<br />tilled
<br />is to
<br />roved
<br />rued
<br />ways
<br />!) ev-
<br />e law
<br />As of
<br />press
<br />,oi g
<br />ereof
<br />early
<br />the
<br />%oard
<br />Chit
<br />'iicl;' -
<br />)rks);
<br />NV
<br />�o. V.
<br />_wr-
<br />.-)ard
<br />..tic
<br />V_
<br />506,
<br />Jun-
<br />lo),
<br />3
<br />MUNI IPAL ECO D
<br />269 SW2d 1; Brunswick v. Scott (Mo
<br />App), 271 SW 994.
<br />" California. Carruth v. Madera, 233
<br />Cal App2d 688, 43 Cal Rptr 855.
<br />Nebraska. Hull v. Humboldt, 107
<br />Neb 326,186 NW 78.
<br />Ohio. Upington v. Oviatt, 24 Ohio St
<br />232, 241; Cincinnati v. Board of Educa-
<br />tion of City School Dist. ofCincinnati, 63
<br />Ohio App 549, 17 Ohio Op 273, 27 NE2d
<br />413.
<br />Pennsylvania. Barton v. Pittsburg,
<br />Brewst 373.
<br />Charter reed not be kept recorded in
<br />suitable book. State v. Faurot, 44 Ohio
<br />App 461, 185 NE 50.
<br />l rdted States. Bart of Palm Beach
<br />Dist, v. Goethals, 104 F d 706.
<br />Iowa, Athearn v. Millersburg, 33
<br />Iowa 105.
<br />§ 1.02
<br />7 Minnesota. State v.'ra, k, 170
<br />Minn 6, 211 NIV673 penal regulation).
<br />New Hampshire. Sav er v. Man-
<br />chester
<br />a -
<br />chest r & K. R. R., 62 NH 135, 155.
<br />Texas. Crabb v. Uvalde Roving Co.
<br />(Tex Corn App), 23 SW2d 300, quoting
<br />Mc uillin text.
<br />8 United States* National Bank of
<br />Commerce v. Town of Granada, 10 US
<br />App 692, 54 F 100, ag 4 8 F 278.
<br />See §14.08.
<br />° Arkansas. Adams v. Sims, 238 Ark
<br />696, 385 SW2d 13, citing Mc uillin text.
<br />Wisconsin. Fort Howard Paper Co. v.
<br />Fox River eights Sanitary Dist., Town .
<br />of A hwaub non, 250 Wis 145,26 N%V2d
<br />661.
<br />14.02. Verson authorized to keep.
<br />There cannot be a legal record without one to keep it, as a clerk
<br />or secretary or orae duly appointed for this purpose,I The I aw usually
<br />designates the officer or persons authorized to make and keep mu-
<br />nicipal records .2 The person so authorized, e.g., a clerk, need not
<br />F r
<br />keepthe record :.:...:.......:.....:.:..:...:.:........:..:..:.:::.
<br />� his v��n ..... ::..... �::.:........:...
<br />and.
<br />N.:....,::..0 ..:.w::r..::::.....::.:..... ::::...._....
<br />...................
<br />:...:..:..::...:...............:..::.:...:...:...:::::h::::.:uh::u
<br />of
<br />o e
<br />...............................:...........
<br />................................................... .
<br />cessary to
<br />`# t the clr::.::. ,rade the record dul elected era -
<br />poit�ed and s*orr. his mere failure o fake the oath of office does
<br />not invalidate his record." I
<br />The officer designated tA5 make and keep municipal recons i
<br />usually the only one legally authorized to do so, although frequent.
<br />Jy a deputy of such officer mai- do so at the direction of such officer
<br />or in his absence.' So mai- acting officers oc~cup ing the offims of the
<br />designated officers -01 In the absence oft the penson named, and where
<br />there is no deputy, the lam- often provides for the appointment of a
<br />clerk or secretary pro tern," in which event the p mn designated t.
<br />make and keep the municipal records may be compelled to make as
<br />part of the record the proceedings kept by the clerk pro tem."
<br />Even in the absence of a provision for a clerk pro tern, it has been
<br />held that corporations have the incident. poorer to name a person
<br />for this purpose. Records kept by such person or records completed
<br />y the secretary or clerk from memoranda kept by the temporary
<br />clerk, duly appointed by the corporate authorities, are legal evidence
<br />
|