My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPLICABILITY OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 AS AMENDED BY AB 889 TO APPLICATIONS PRESENTED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION PRIOR TO EFFECTIVE DATE OF AB 889
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Legal Opinions
>
1972-2010 Opinions
>
APPLICABILITY OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 AS AMENDED BY AB 889 TO APPLICATIONS PRESENTED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION PRIOR TO EFFECTIVE DATE OF AB 889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:31:17 PM
Creation date
7/21/2010 7:28:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legal Opinions
Description
APPLICABILITY OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 AS AMENDED BY AB 889 TO APPLICATIONS PRESENTED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION PRIOR TO EFFECTIVE DATE OF AB 889
Date
8/16/1973
Agency
Planning & Building
Notes
OPINION 73-53
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0~~~-ICE OF THc C:-'rr ATTC1RV~Y <br />OPINION NJ. 73-53 <br />August 16~ 1973 <br />r~,lBJECT : Appl i cabi i i ty o'r` Ca 1 i forni a Environmental <br />Quality Act of 1970 as Amended by AB 889 <br />to Applir.ations Presented and Approved by <br />Planning Commission Prior to the Effective <br />Date of AB 889, December 5, 197%', but Finally <br />Approved by the City Council After the <br />Effective Date of AB 889 <br />REQUESTED BY: Planning Director and Assistant Planner <br />OPINION BY: James A. Withers, City Attorney <br />By Charles J. !.iberto, Assistant City <br />Attorney <br />QUESTION 1: "Is an environmental impact report for <br />Variance 72-81 legally required under <br />the provisions of the California <br />Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as <br />_ amended by AB 889?" <br />ANSWER 1: No <br />QUESTION 2: "If ari environmental impact report is <br />required, shouid the environmental impac~ <br />report be set for public hearing to adopt <br />the City's final environmental impact report <br />for Variance 72-81?" <br />ANSWER 2: This question is inapplicable since an <br />environmental impact report is not required. <br />QUESTION 3: "If an environmental impact report i; not: <br />required, would it be advisable to submit t~~ <br />the Planning Commission fur information, <br />and request Planniny Commission to receive <br />and file the report?" <br />ANSWER 3: Whether or riot an environmental impact report <br />should be prepared and submitted to the <br />Planning Commission is an administrative <br />determination that should be made by the <br />Planniny Department. Legally speaking, <br />however, i f the E IR i s set for put, 9 i z~ <br />hearing or even received and '+~i ied by the <br />Planniny Commission, such action ~~iyl~+~ <br />105 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.