Laserfiche WebLink
Upinicn No. 73-53 <br />page ,, <br />constitute an actual or implied waiver <br />of the moratorium period and *he exemption <br />applicable prior to the commei:cement of the <br />moratorium period, and in effect, deprive <br />VA 72-81 of its immunity from co~~i;;lying with <br />the Environmental Impact Report Procedure <br />requirements. <br />FACTS <br />The facts as related by you to *his office are <br />as follows: <br />"The original variance application was filed <br />Lfor Variance 72-81] on November 6, 1972 with the <br />final decision of approval by the City Council on <br />December 18, 1972. The effects of AB 889 granting <br />option of waiving the requirements of EIR's for <br />discretionary permits and licenses for a 120-day <br />period commenced on December 5, 1972, and terminated <br />on April 4, 1973.. Although the City did not require <br />an EIR for Variance 72-81, staff suggested to the <br />developer to prepare a report for the project. <br />This report was prepared and submitted to the <br />Planning Department for review on March 20, 1973. <br />As the project was approved on December 18, 19?2, <br />during the moratorium period, staff has not as of <br />yet, submitted the EIR to the Planning Commission <br />for a public hearing concerning the adequacy of the <br />report. In summary, staff requests a legal <br />interpretation of the following questions, etc.'° <br />ANALYSIS <br />The California Environ~:iental Quality Act of 1970 <br />as amended by AB 889 pertaining to Division 13, Chapter 6, <br />Section 21169 of the California State Public Resources Code <br />states: <br />"Any project defined in subdivision (c) of <br />Section 21065 undertaken, carried out or <br />approved on or before the effective date of this <br />section and the issuance by any public agenc,~ of <br />any lease, permit, license, certificate or other <br />106 <br />