Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Preparedness Grants Manual <br />available upon request to promote transparency in decision-making related to SHSP and UASI <br />activities. <br />To manage this effort and to further reinforce collaboration and coordination across the stakeholder <br />community, a portion of the 20% holdback of a state or territory award may be utilized by the SAA to <br />support the SAC and to ensure representation and active participation of SAC members. Funding <br />may be used for hiring and training planners, establishing and maintaining a program management <br />structure, identifying and managing projects, conducting research necessary to inform the planning <br />process, and developing plans that bridge mechanisms, documents, protocols, and procedures. <br />8.9.Urban Area Working Group (Homeland Security Grant Program) <br />To support the Whole Community Approach (see Section 1.6 “Strengthening Governance Integration” <br />and Section 6.13 “Whole Community Preparedness”), high-risk urban areas are required to establish <br />UAWGs representative of the counties, cities, towns, and tribes within the high-risk urban area <br />including, as appropriate, representatives of rural jurisdictions, high-population jurisdictions, and <br />high-threat jurisdictions. <br />UASI implementation and governance must include regional partners and should have balanced <br />representation among entities with operational responsibilities for prevention, protection, mitigation, <br />and response activities within the region. In some instances, high-risk urban area boundaries cross <br />state borders. States and territories must ensure that the identified high-risk urban areas take an <br />inclusive regional approach to the development and implementation of the UASI and involve the <br />contiguous jurisdictions, mutual aid partners, port authorities, rail and transit authorities, state <br />agencies, Statewide Interoperability Coordinators, Citizen Corps Whole Community Council(s), and <br />campus law enforcement in their program activities. <br />8.9.1. URBAN AREA WORKING GROUP COMPOSITION AND SCOPE <br />Pursuant to section 2003(b) of the HSA (codified as amended at 6 U.S.C. § 604(b)), eligible high-risk <br />urban areas were determined based on an analysis of relative risk of the 100 most populous <br />Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA), as defined by OMB. MSAs are used by FEMA to determine <br />eligibility for participation in the program. Geographical areas queried do not equate to minimum <br />mandated membership representation of an urban area, nor does this guarantee funding for <br />geographical areas queried. UAWGs are not required to expand or contract existing urban area <br />participation to conform to MSA composition. Detailed information on MSAs is publicly available from <br />the United States Census Bureau. <br />An SAA must confirm a specific POC with the designated high-risk urban area. The SAA POC is <br />responsible for identifying and coordinating with the POC for the UAWG. This information must be <br />provided to FEMA with the grant application. SAAs must work with existing high-risk urban areas to <br />ensure that information for current POCs is on file with FEMA. <br />Membership in the UAWG must provide either direct or indirect representation for all relevant <br />jurisdictions and response disciplines (including law enforcement, fire service, EMS, hospitals, public <br />health, and emergency management) that comprise the defined high-risk urban area. It must also be <br />inclusive of local Whole Community Citizen Corps Council and tribal representatives. The UAWG <br />should also include at least one representative from each of the following significant stakeholders: <br />.Local and tribal government officials; <br />68