My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 12 - Density Bonus Agreement No. 2025-03
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
07/15/2025
>
Item 12 - Density Bonus Agreement No. 2025-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2025 10:17:50 AM
Creation date
7/9/2025 10:01:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
12
Date
7/15/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DBA No. 2025-03 — Olive Crest (2130 East Fourth Street) <br />June 23, 2025 <br />Page 8 <br />Table 4: Analysis of the Requested Concessions (3) and Waiver (1) <br />Standard <br />Analysis <br />Section 4.5 (Publicly Accessible Open Space) of the MEMU states that a <br />minimum of ten -percent of the gross site area (115,029 square feet) is required <br />to be dedicated to publicly accessible open space. Instead, the Project provides <br />no accessible open space. <br />Providing the required publicly accessible open space would reduce the total <br />number of units that can be developed, reduce the overall number of surface <br />parking on the site, and/or impact the drive aisle area, compromising the <br />Project's feasibility and safety for residents and emergency responders. <br />Moreover, given the existing office building development location, limited drive <br />aisle width along Fourth Street, and the overall site configuration, providing <br />publicly accessible open space would be physically infeasible. It would require <br />physically altering/reducing the existing office building along the Fourth Street <br />Publicly Accessible <br />frontage to allow for the required plaza, courtyard, or other publicly accessible <br />Open Space <br />open space area. <br />(Incentive/Concession) <br />Therefore, the site cannot accommodate the publicly accessible open space <br />required without making the Project financially infeasible. This would likely lead <br />to a reduced unit count, smaller unit sizes, or a narrower drive aisle, creating a <br />multiplying effect that ultimately decreases the size of the buildings. The units <br />have been carefully designed to balance common areas and bedroom space, <br />and any further reduction could compromise livability for future owners. <br />Moreover, if the Project becomes financially unviable, it could result in the loss <br />of the three affordable units. Lastly, the overall site design and proposed <br />amenities took into account the proximity of the City of Santa Ana Zoo/Prentice <br />Park, which is located approximately 4,500 linear feet (0.85 miles) to the <br />southwest of the project site, and Cabrillo Park, which is approximately 2,400 <br />linear feet (0.45 miles) to the northwest of the project site. The close proximity <br />of the City park space reduces the overall impact of the concession for the <br />publicly accessible open sace. <br />Section 4.6 (Private/Common Open Space) of the MEMU indicates that the <br />minimum required private open space is 90 square feet per dwelling unit. As <br />proposed, the Project does not provide any private open space for the units. <br />The most direct approach to meeting the minimum private open space <br />requirement would involve constructing balconies, patios, terraces, or rooftop <br />decks for each unit. This requirement would not only compromise the livability <br />Private Open Space <br />but also reduce the sense of privacy for residents, as the anticipated residents <br />(Incentive/Concession) <br />would include transitional age youth (TAY), who often includes individuals who <br />are aging out of foster care, exiting the juvenile justice system, or experiencing <br />homelessness, mental health challenges, or other vulnerabilities. Additionally, <br />constructing balconies, patios, terraces, or rooftop decks for each unit would <br />be economically infeasible and the strict adherence would lead to the <br />elimination of residential units, which would affect the feasibility to construct the <br />Project. Staff notes that the overall site design and proposed amenities took <br />into account the proximity of the City of Santa Ana Zoo/Prentice Park and <br />Cabrillo Park, which are located approximately 0.85-miles and 0.45-miles <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.