My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-06-17 Regular
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
2025-06-17 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 12:23:18 PM
Creation date
7/22/2025 12:22:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Agency
City Council
Date
6/17/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCILCOMMENTS <br /> AB1234 DISCLOSURE — If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for <br /> members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board <br /> or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended. <br /> MINUTES: Councilmember Phan thanked everyone who spoke. She questioned staff <br /> about whether the City had made any requests for federal immigration or border <br /> security agencies to be present in the city, whether the City had collaborated with the <br /> National Guard or specifically asked for their presence, raised concerns regarding <br /> reports of community members being detained by unidentified individuals who were <br /> presumed to be immigration agents, asked for clarification regarding a phone call the <br /> City Attorney received from the U.S. Attorney related to the City assisting in securing <br /> the federal building, and whether the City Attorney had previously received a direct call <br /> from the U.S. Attorney. <br /> City Manager Alvaro Nunez confirmed the City had not made any requests for the <br /> agencies to be present in Santa Ana. Police Chief Robert Rodriguez confirmed the City <br /> had neither requested the National Guard's presence nor collaborated with their efforts. <br /> City Attorney Sonia Carvalho confirmed the City had received such calls before, but <br /> none were related to immigration; they were for other ongoing investigations. <br /> Councilmember Phan inquired regarding the essence of the U.S. Attorney's message, <br /> stating she understood that it was a threat about sending in the National Guard if the <br /> city did not help clear the federal building and requested clarification about the use of <br /> the term "overrun." <br /> City Manager Nunez responded that the U.S. Attorney requested help and assistance <br /> for federal agents and staff and that it was the U.S. Attorney that used the term <br /> "overrun." <br /> in response to Councilmember Phan, Police Chief Rodriguez confirmed that City police <br /> officers secured the federal building's sidewalks in an effort to prevent the National <br /> Guard from being deployed to Santa Ana; to which Councilmember Phan noted that <br /> the National Guard was deployed anyway and she asked the City Attorney if there was <br /> any law the city council could use to remove ICE from Santa Ana. <br /> City Attorney Carvalho stated the city has no authority to prevent ICE from operating <br /> within its boundaries. <br /> Councilmember Phan stated the city lacks any legal means to prohibit or remove ICE <br /> from Santa Ana, noting that if it were possible, Los Angeles would have already done <br /> so, and asked whether the city had any authority to remove Border Patrol. <br /> City Attorney Carvalho confirmed that the city does not have the authority to remove <br /> Border Patrol or the National Guard, noting that even the Governor, with significantly <br /> more power and the support of the California Attorney General, has been unsuccessful <br /> in forcing the National Guard out of the state. <br /> CITY COUNCIL. 22 JUNE 17, 2025 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.