Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J A N U S <br /> robert imboden, assoc. aia <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />page 13 of 17 <br /> <br />1120 n. granada drive, orange, california 92869 | 714 . 299 . 0330 | robert@janusconsultants.com <br />www.janusconsultants.com <br /> <br />An existing stoop is present at the rear entry to the home. As no original architectural drawings of <br />the home are known to exist, it is not known if the existing stoop dates from or reflects the original <br />design. While the existing metal handrail may be original to the home, it differs in that it is simpler in <br />design and construction than those located on the home’s balconies. Flagstone veneer has been <br />applied to all of the surfaces of the stoop [landing, treads, risers and sides], which is inconsistent <br />with both the style and era of the home. <br />The project scope includes removal/replacement of the existing stoop. The replacement stoop will <br />be similar to the existing in its overall form, but includes stairs on both the north and south sides of <br />the landing. This change will provide improved access to the rear yard and pool. A solid wall <br />finished in stucco [to match house] will form the outer rail at the landing. Wall mounted iron <br />handrails are also proposed. The landing, treads and risers will be natural, exposed concrete. <br /> <br />The SOI Standards include the following recommendations appropriate for entrances and porches: <br /> <br />x Identifying, retaining, and preserving entrances -- and their functional and decorative <br />features--that are important in defining the overall historic character of the building. <br />x Replacing in kind an entire entrance or porch that is too deteriorated to repair -- if the <br />form and detailing are still evident -- using the physical evidence as a model to reproduce <br />the feature. If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible, <br />then a compatible substitute material may be considered. <br />x Complying with life-safety codes in such a manner that the historic building’s character- <br />defining features and finishes to comply with life-safety code requirements. <br />x Designing and installing entrances or porches when required for the new use in a manner <br />that preserves the historic character of the buildings, i.e., limiting such alteration to non- <br />character-defining facades. <br /> <br />The existing stoop has been modified over time. The flagstone finish is inconsistent with the home’s <br />style and era of construction. The character of the existing stoop appears to be later than the <br />home’s construction, is inconsistent with the property’s Italian Renaissance revival style, and lacks <br />evidence of possessing historic significance in its own right. <br />The design for the replacement stoop is similar in size, scale and mass as the existing stoop and is <br />located at the home’s rear [secondary] façade. The simple design of the replacement stoop <br />provides differentiation in that it does not mimic the more decorative steps and balustrades <br />prevalent throughout the home. The construction of the new stoop is reversable in that it could be <br />removed in the future without the loss of any character defining features of the property. The simple <br />design of the proposed stoop is also appropriate in consideration of the more utilitarian nature of <br />the rear entry. The proposed materials [concrete, stucco and metal handrails] are consistent and <br />    <br />Historic Resources Commission 108 1/11/2024 <br />