Laserfiche WebLink
5 LESS -THAN -SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS <br />WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED <br />Explanation of the Rationale: The rationale and facts supporting the above finding are fully <br />developed in Section 4.1, Air Quality, pages 4.1-48 through 4.1-51 of the Draft Supplemental EIR. <br />The following presents a summary of that rationale: <br />The Project would not have a considerable contribution to cumulative impacts related to <br />consistency with applicable air quality plans or regional and localized emissions with the <br />implementation of Project -Specific MM AQ-1, to reduce the Project's operational emissions of <br />VOCs and its contribution of ozone precursors to the SCAB to below the SCAQMD's threshold of <br />significance. Additionally, GPU PEIR MM AQ-1 would require the use of construction equipment <br />rated by the USEPA as having Tier 4 emissions limits for engines between 50 and 750 <br />horsepower to reduce the carcinogenic and acute hazard risks. Therefore, cumulative impacts <br />related to consistency with applicable air quality plans and regional and localized emissions were <br />determined to be less than significant after mitigation. <br />5.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />Threshold C-2: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to State CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15064.5 with the imDlementation of mitiaation. <br />Findings: The City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, <br />the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified <br />in the Final Supplemental EIR. Specifically, the City finds that the following mitigation measure <br />shall be implemented to reduce potentially significant cultural resource impacts resulting from the <br />Project (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.2-15 — 4.2-16): <br />GPU PEIR MM CUL-6: If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological <br />resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a <br />qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor approved by a California Native <br />American Tribe identified by the Native American Heritage Commission as culturally <br />affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre - <br />construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil of high sensitivity. The <br />archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the <br />proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held <br />in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the <br />importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The <br />Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that <br />archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing <br />activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted <br />while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the <br />Secretary's Standards. and This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the <br />Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal <br />resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any <br />collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />5-6 <br />