Laserfiche WebLink
5 LESS -THAN -SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS <br />WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED <br />listed under GPU PEIR MM AQ-1 and AQ-2 are either suggested for industrial uses or do not <br />directly reduce operational VOC emissions. Therefore, Project -Specific MM AQ-1 would be <br />implemented to reduce significant impacts related to VOCs during Project operations. <br />Threshold AQ-3: The Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant <br />concentrations with the implementation of mitigation. <br />Findings: The City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, <br />the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified <br />in the Final Supplemental EIR. Specifically, the City finds that GPU PEIR MM AQ-1 (listed above) <br />shall be implemented to reduce potentially significant air quality impacts resulting from the Project. <br />(Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 4.1-39.) <br />Explanation of the Rationale: The rationale and facts supporting the above finding are fully <br />developed in Section 4.1, Air Quality, pages 4.1-42 through 4.1-47 of the Draft Supplemental EIR. <br />The following presents a summary of that rationale: <br />The Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, including <br />to significant health risk impacts for residential sensitive receptors during project construction with <br />the implementation of GPU PEIR MM AQ-1. Pursuant to GPU PEIR MM AQ-1, the Project <br />requires use of construction equipment rated by the USEPA as having Tier 4 (model year 2008 <br />or newer) emissions limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower. The total <br />highest calculated carcinogenic risk would be approximately 7.36 in one million and would not <br />exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million with the implementation of GPU PEIR MM <br />AQ-1. Therefore, construction activities associated with the Project are not anticipated to result in <br />a significant cancer or other health risk to nearby sensitive receptors, and, as such, the health <br />impacts during construction of the Project would be less than significant with <br />mitigation incorporated. <br />Further, by complying with GPU PEIR MM AQ-1, the Project would reduce construction -related <br />DPM emissions and associated acute risk, and the highest maximum chronic and acute hazard <br />index associated with the mitigated emissions from Project construction at residential sensitive <br />receptors would be 0.136 and 0.918 and would not exceed the 1.0 chronic hazard index for <br />individual significance. Therefore, the Project's chronic and acute hazard index would be less <br />than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br />Cumulative Impacts: The Project would not result in cumulative impacts concerning air quality <br />with the implementation of mitigation. <br />Findings: The City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, <br />the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified <br />in the Final Supplemental EIR. Specifically, the City finds that GPU PEIR MM AQ-1 and Project <br />Specific MM AQ-1 (listed previously) shall be implemented to reduce potentially significant air <br />quality impacts resulting from the Project. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.1-39 — 4.1-41.) <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />5-5 <br />